Cited by 43Plant tissue culture and regenerationEpigenetics and DNA MethylationPlant Molecular Biology Research

KNOX1 is expressed and epigenetically regulated during in vitro conditions in Agave spp

Open access
De-la-Peña, Clelia, Nic-Can, Geovanny, Ojeda, Gabriel, Herrera-Herrera, José L, López-Torres, Adolfo, Wrobel, Kazimierz, Robert-Díaz, Manuel L·2012·BMC Plant Biology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The micropropagation is a powerful tool to scale up plants of economical and agronomical importance, enhancing crop productivity. However, a small but growing body of evidence suggests that epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation and histone modifications, can be affected under the in vitro conditions characteristic of micropropagation. Here, we tested whether the adaptation to different in vitro systems (Magenta boxes and Bioreactors) modified epigenetically different clones of Agave fourcroydes and A. angustifolia. Furthermore, we assessed whether these epigenetic changes affect the regulatory expression of KNOTTED1-like HOMEOBOX (KNOX) transcription factors. RESULTS: To gain a better understanding of epigenetic changes during in vitro and ex vitro conditions in Agave fourcroydes and A. angustifolia, we analyzed global DNA methylation, as well as different histone modification marks, in two different systems: semisolid in Magenta boxes (M) and temporary immersion in modular Bioreactors (B). No significant difference was found in DNA methylation in A. fourcroydes grown in either M or B. However, when A. fourcroydes was compared with A. angustifolia, there was a two-fold difference in DNA methylation between the species, independent of the in vitro system used. Furthermore, we detected an absence or a low amount of the repressive mark H3K9me2 in ex vitro conditions in plants that were cultured earlier either in M or B. Moreover, the expression of AtqKNOX1 and AtqKNOX2, on A. fourcroydes and A. angustifolia clones, is affected during in vitro conditions. Therefore, we used Chromatin ImmunoPrecipitation (ChIP) to know whether these genes were epigenetically regulated. In the case of AtqKNOX1, the H3K4me3 and H3K9me2 were affected during in vitro conditions in comparison with AtqKNOX2. CONCLUSIONS: Agave clones plants with higher DNA methylation during in vitro conditions were better adapted to ex vitro conditions. In addition, A. fourcroydes and A. angustifolia clones displayed differential expression of the KNOX1 gene during in vitro conditions, which is epigenetically regulated by the H3K4me3 and H3K9me2 marks. The finding of an epigenetic regulation in key developmental genes will make it important in future studies to identify factors that help to find climate-resistant micropropagated plants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2229-12-203

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Agave fourcroydes and A. angustifolia, no significant differences in global DNA methylation were found between clones grown in Magenta boxes and bioreactors, but a two-fold difference was found between the two species independent of the in vitro system used.

    “A global DNA methylation level analysis revealed no significant differences between the A. fourcroydes clones grown in either M or B in vitro systems, but, when the two agave species were compared, there was a two-fold difference between them, independent of the in vitro system used.”

    From Somaclonal Variation—Advantage or Disadvantage in Micropropagation of the Medicinal Plants (2023) · cites this paper as de-la-Pena et al. (2012) [126]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De-la-Peña, C., Nic-Can, G., Ojeda, G., Herrera-Herrera, J. L., López-Torres, A., Wrobel, K., & Robert-Díaz, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Autonomous University of Yucatán (MX)
  • Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, A.C (MX)
  • Universidad de Guanajuato (MX)
Venue
BMC Plant Biology
Published
2012
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
203
ISSN
1471-2229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967932067
Cited by
43
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Plant Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CB2012)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
Keywords
Agave fourcroydes, Agave angustifolia, KNOX transcription factors, DNA methylation, histone modifications, H3K4me3, H3K9me2, epigenetic regulation, in vitro adaptation, ex vitro acclimatization, bioreactors
MeSH terms
Histones, Lysine, Plant Proteins, Immunoblotting, Homeodomain Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, DNA, Plant, Genome, Plant, DNA Methylation, Agave, Epigenesis, Genetic, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review