Cited by 2,890Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsAgricultural Science and FertilizationSoil Management and Crop Yield

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal - a review

Glaser, Bruno, Lehmann, Johannes, Zech, Wolfgang·2002·Biology and Fertility of Soils

Abstract

Rapid turnover of organic matter leads to a low efficiency of organic fertilizers applied to increase and sequester C in soils of the humid tropics. Charcoal was reported to be responsible for high soil organic matter contents and soil fertility of anthropogenic soils (Terra Preta) found in central Amazonia. Therefore, we reviewed the available information about the physical and chemical properties of charcoal as affected by different combustion procedures, and the effects of its application in agricultural fields on nutrient retention and crop production. Higher nutrient retention and nutrient availability were found after charcoal additions to soil, related to higher exchange capacity, surface area and direct nutrient additions. Higher charring temperatures generally improved exchange properties and surface area of the charcoal. Additionally, charcoal is relatively recalcitrant and can therefore be used as a long-term sink for atmospheric CO2. Several aspects of a charcoal management system remain unclear, such as the role of microorganisms in oxidizing charcoal surfaces and releasing nutrients and the possibilities to improve charcoal properties during production under field conditions. Several research needs were identified, such as field testing of charcoal production in tropical agroecosystems, the investigation of surface properties of the carbonized materials in the soil environment, and the evaluation of the agronomic and economic effectiveness of soil management with charcoal.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00374-002-0466-4

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 76 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 1,001–1,011 of 1,011

Metadata

Authors
Glaser, B., Lehmann, J., & Zech, W.
Affiliations
  • University of Bayreuth (DE)
  • Cornell University (US)
Venue
Biology and Fertility of Soils
Published
2002-06-01
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
219-230
ISSN
  • 0178-2762 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0789
OpenAlex
W2126768074
Cited by
2,890
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 95 · 2025: 127 · 2024: 130 · 2023: 185 · 2022: 198 · 2021: 208 · 2020: 224 · 2019: 204 · 2018: 198 · 2017: 186 · 2016: 176 · 2015: 178 · 2014: 176 · 2013: 159 · 2012: 131
FWCI
18.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biology and Fertility of Soils (publishedVersion)
  • VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
Keywords
biochar, charcoal, terra preta, highly weathered soils, tropical soils, soil organic matter, soil fertility, nutrient retention, cation exchange capacity, charring temperature, soil carbon sequestration, charcoal combustion, soil physical properties, soil chemical properties, crop production, microorganisms, anthropogenic soils

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review