Cited by 281Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFire effects on ecosystemsMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions

Impact of biochar on mineralisation of C and N from soil and willow litter and its relationship with microbial community biomass and structure

Prayogo, Cahyo, Jones, Julie E., Baeyens, Jan, Bending, Gary D.·2014·Biology and Fertility of Soils

Abstract

Using a laboratory experiment, we investigated the effect of applying willow biochar to short rotation coppice soil on C and N dynamics and microbial biomass and community composition, in the presence and absence of willow litter. Application of biochar at a rate of 0.5 % had no effect on net CO₂mineralisation in the presence or absence of litter. However at a rate of 2 %, net CO₂mineralisation was reduced by 10 and 20 % over a 90-day period in the absence and presence of litter respectively. Biochar reduced N mineralisation when applied at both 0.5 and 2 % concentrations. pH was increased by application of 2 % biochar to soil. Phospholipid fatty acid analysis demonstrated that both concentrations of biochar affected microbial community composition, although the effect of biochar was not as great as the effect of time or litter application in shaping community structure. In particular, the amount of bacterial biomass was increased by biochar application to soil, and there was evidence for increased abundance of Gram-negative bacteria and actinobacteria following biochar application. The data is discussed in the context of microbial mechanisms underlying impacts of biochar on C cycling in soil, and the coupling of C and N cycles following amendment of soil with biochar.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00374-013-0884-5

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prayogo, C., Jones, J. E., Baeyens, J., & Bending, G. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Brawijaya (ID)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Bending, Gary D.
Venue
Biology and Fertility of Soils
Published
2013-11-27
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
695-702
ISSN
  • 0178-2762 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0789
OpenAlex
W1963788592
Cited by
281
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 15
FWCI
27.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biology and Fertility of Soils (publishedVersion)
Funders
Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Keywords
biochar, carbon mineralization, nitrogen mineralization, microbial biomass, microbial community composition, soil pH, phospholipid fatty acids, Gram-negative bacteria, actinobacteria, carbon-nitrogen coupling, soil carbon cycling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review