Cited by 343Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFire effects on ecosystemsSoil erosion and sediment transport

Interactive Priming of Biochar and Labile Organic Matter Mineralization in a Smectite-Rich Soil

Keith, Alexandra, Singh, Balwant, Singh, Bhupinder Pal·2011·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Biochar is considered as an attractive tool for long-term carbon (C) storage in soil. However, there is limited knowledge about the effect of labile organic matter (LOM) on biochar-C mineralization in soil or the vice versa. An incubation experiment (20 °C) was conducted for 120 days to quantify the interactive priming effects of biochar-C and LOM-C mineralization in a smectitic clayey soil. Sugar cane residue (source of LOM) at a rate of 0, 1, 2, and 4% (w/w) in combination with two wood biochars (450 and 550 °C) at a rate of 2% (w/w) were applied to the soil. The use of biochars (~ -36‰) and LOM (-12.7‰) or soil (-14.3‰) with isotopically distinct δ(13)C values allowed the quantification of C mineralized from biochar and LOM/soil. A small fraction (0.4-1.1%) of the applied biochar-C was mineralized, and the mineralization of biochar-C increased significantly with increasing application rates of LOM, especially during the early stages of incubation. Concurrently, biochar application reduced the mineralization of LOM-C, and the magnitude of this effect increased with increasing rate of LOM addition. Over time, the interactive priming of biochar-C and LOM-C mineralization was stabilized. Biochar application possesses a considerable merit for long-term soil C-sequestration, and it has a stabilizing effect on LOM in soil.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es202186j

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Positive priming is induced via the addition of fresh labile carbon which can stimulate the activities of soil microorganisms, thus accelerating the carbon mineralization process.

    “Positive priming is induced via the addition of fresh labile carbon which can stimulate the activities of soil microorganisms, thus accelerating the carbon mineralization process (Fang et al. 2019; Keith et al. 2011; Zimmerman and Ouyang 2019).”

    From Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality (2023) · cites this paper as Keith et al. 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keith, A., Singh, B., & Singh, B. P.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Singh, Balwant
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2011-10-20
Volume
45
Issue
22
Pages
9611-9618
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2322552228
Cited by
343
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 7
FWCI
36.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Western Sydney
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
biochar, labile organic matter, carbon mineralization, priming effect, soil carbon sequestration, sugarcane waste, wood biochar, carbon isotope labeling, soil carbon stabilization, biochar application rate
MeSH terms
Charcoal, Soil, Temperature, Silicates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review