Cited by 102Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsPectus Deformity Diagnosis and TreatmentReconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques

Endoscopic technique for sagittal synostosis

Jimenez, David F., Barone, Constance M.·2012·Child's Nervous System

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed to present a 16-year experience of treating sagittal synostosis with endoscopic-assisted techniques and postoperative cranial orthotic therapy. In 1996, we introduced the use of endoscopes for the management of sagittal synostosis in four young infants. During the subsequent years, we have treated a total of 256 patients with great success and long-term follow-up. Presented herein are the techniques and results of such clinical experience.Methods A total of 256 patients with sagittal synostosis have been treated between May 1996 and April 2012. There were 187 males and 69 females. Mean age at time of surgery was 3.9 months. A wide-vertex craniectomy with bilateral barrel stave osteotomies of the temporal and parietal bones using small scalp incisions and endoscopic viewing techniques was performed. Instruments have been developed to assist with the operation. All patients were placed in postoperative molding cranial orthosis.Results Mean estimated blood loss was 27 cc. Mean transfusion rate was 7 %. Mean surgical time was 57 min. Mean length of stay was 1.1 days. Using cephalic index (CI) as an anthropometric measurement to judge head shape, our results were classified as excellent (CI>80), good (CI 80-70), or poor (CI<70). A total of 87 % were classified as excellent, 9 % as good, and 4 % as poor.Conclusions Endoscopic-assisted management of sagittal synostosis is a safe, efficacious, and excellent option for treating this condition with long-lasting, superb results. It is associated with minimal morbidity and complications and improved results over traditional procedures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00381-012-1768-y

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jimenez, D. F., & Barone, C. M.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Jimenez, David F.
Venue
Child's Nervous System
Published
2012-08-08
Volume
28
Issue
9
Pages
1333-1339
ISSN
  • 0256-7040 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-0350
OpenAlex
W2035906713
Cited by
102
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child s Nervous System (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
Keywords
sagittal synostosis, cephalic index, surgical outcomes, blood loss
MeSH terms
Anthropometry, Child, Preschool, Cranial Sutures, Craniosynostoses, Craniotomy, Endoscopy, Female, Humans, Infant, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Orthopedic Procedures, Plastic Surgery Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review