Cited by 23Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsPectus Deformity Diagnosis and TreatmentReconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques

Less is more: does the addition of barrel staves improve results in endoscopic strip craniectomy for sagittal craniosynostosis?

Open access
Wood, Benjamin C., Ahn, Edward S., Wang, Joanna Y., Oh, Albert K., Keating, Robert F., Rogers, Gary F., Magge, Suresh N.·2017·Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) with postoperative helmet orthosis is a well-established treatment option for sagittal craniosynostosis. There are many technical variations to the surgery ranging from simple strip craniectomy to methods that employ multiple cranial osteotomies. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the addition of lateral barrel-stave osteotomies during ESC improved morphological outcomes. METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective review was conducted on a consecutive series of cases involving ESC for sagittal craniosynostosis at 2 different institutions from March 2008 to August 2014. The patients in Group A underwent ESC and those in Group B had ESC with lateral barrel-stave osteotomies. Demographic and perioperative data were recorded; postoperative morphological outcomes were analyzed using 3D laser scan data acquired from a single orthotic manufacturer who managed patients from both institutions. RESULTS: A total of 73 patients were included (34 in Group A and 39 in Group B). Compared with Group B patients, Group A patients had a shorter mean anesthetic time (161.7 vs 195 minutes; p < 0.01) and operative time (71.6 vs 111 minutes; p < 0.01). The mean hospital stay was similar for the 2 groups (1.2 days for Group A vs 1.4 days for Group B; p = 0.1). Adequate postoperative data on morphological outcomes were reported by the orthotic manufacturer for 65 patients (29 in Group A and 36 in Group B). The 2 groups had similar improvement in the cephalic index (CI): Group A, mean change 10.5% (mean preoperative CI 72.6, final 80.4) at a mean follow-up of 13.2 months; Group B, mean change 12.2% (mean preoperative CI 71.0, final 79.6) at a mean follow-up of 19.4 months. The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Both ESC alone and ESC with barrel staving produced excellent outcomes. However, the addition of barrel staves did not improve the results and, therefore, may not be warranted in the endoscopic treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3171/2017.1.peds16478

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data collected with the 3D stereography method can be used for post-operative production of a personalised helmet orthosis.

    “In addition to finding a diagnosis with the 3D stereography method described from de Jong et al. 2020, this method also enables an effective follow-up assessment, and the data collected can also be used for the post-operative production of a personalised helmet orthosis [77–79].”

    From Developments in diagnostic and surgical techniques in children with sagittal suture craniosynostosis: a systematic review spanning the last 30 years (2025) · cites this paper as [77]

    The Helmet Therapy and Outcome Analysis section says patients received postoperative helmet therapy and that the orthotic manufacturer supplied laser scans used to assess outcomes. It does not say that 3D stereography data were used to produce personalised helmets. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The 3D stereography method described by de Jong et al. 2020 enables effective follow-up assessment.

    “In addition to finding a diagnosis with the 3D stereography method described from de Jong et al. 2020, this method also enables an effective follow-up assessment, and the data collected can also be used for the post-operative production of a personalised helmet orthosis [77–79].”

    From Developments in diagnostic and surgical techniques in children with sagittal suture craniosynostosis: a systematic review spanning the last 30 years (2025) · cites this paper as [77]

    The Helmet Therapy and Outcome Analysis section (page unavailable) says postoperative laser scans were used to assess outcomes and define follow-up duration. It does not describe de Jong et al.’s 2020 3D stereography method or establish that this specific method enables effective follow-up assessment. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wood, B. C., Ahn, E. S., Wang, J. Y., Oh, A. K., Keating, R. F., Rogers, G. F., & Magge, S. N.
Affiliations
  • Divisions of Plastic Surgery and
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Children's National (US)
Corresponding author
Wood, Benjamin C.
Venue
Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics
Published
2017-07
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
86-90
ISSN
  • 1933-0707 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-0715
OpenAlex
W2607341432
Cited by
23
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
Keywords
sagittal craniosynostosis, endoscopic strip craniectomy, cephalic index, skull morphology, operative time
MeSH terms
Child, Preschool, Craniosynostoses, Craniotomy, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Length of Stay, Orthotic Devices, Osteotomy, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Neuroendoscopy, Operative Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review