Cited by 39Gut microbiota and healthProbiotics and Fermented FoodsGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Impact of a very low-energy diet on the fecal microbiota of obese individuals

Simões, C. D., Maukonen, J., Scott, K. P., Virtanen, K. A., Pietiläinen, K. H., Saarela, M.·2014·European Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Purpose Study how the dietary intake affects the fecal microbiota of a group of obese individuals after a 6-week very low-energy diet (VLED) and thereafter during a follow-up period of 5, 8, and 12 months. Additionally, we compared two different methods, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and real-time PCR (qPCR), for the quantification of fecal samples.Methods Sixteen subjects participated in a 12-month dietary intervention which consisted of a VLED high in protein and low in carbohydrates followed by a personalized diet plan, combined with exercise and lifestyle counseling. Fecal samples were analyzed using qPCR, FISH, and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis.Results The VLED affected the fecal microbiota, in particular bifidobacteria that decreased approximately two logs compared with the baseline numbers. The change in numbers of the bacterial groups studied followed the dietary intake and not the weight variations during the 12-month intervention. Methanogens were detected in 56% of the participants at every sampling point, regardless of the dietary intake. Moreover, although absolute numbers of comparable bacterial groups were similar between FISH and qPCR measurements, relative proportions were higher according to FISH results.Conclusions Changes in the fecal microbial numbers of obese individuals were primarily affected by the dietary intake rather than weight changes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00394-013-0645-0

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simões, C. D., Maukonen, J., Scott, K. P., Virtanen, K. A., Pietiläinen, K. H., & Saarela, M.
Affiliations
  • VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (FI)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • Turku University Hospital (FI)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Simões, C. D.
Venue
European Journal of Nutrition
Published
2013-12-31
Volume
53
Issue
6
Pages
1421-1429
ISSN
  • 1436-6207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1436-6215
OpenAlex
W2078884805
Cited by
39
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Novo Nordisk Fonden (#NNF10OC1013354)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
very low calorie diet, fecal microbiota, obesity, Bifidobacterium, methanogenic archaea, high-protein low-carbohydrate diet, dietary intervention, weight loss, fluorescence in situ hybridization, real-time PCR quantification
MeSH terms
Body Weight, Energy Intake, DNA, Bacterial, Feces, Feeding Behavior, Female, Finland, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Life Style, Male, Obesity, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Colony Count, Microbial, Exercise, Body Mass Index, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Caloric Restriction, White People, Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review