Cited by 32Effects of Radiation ExposureSpaceflight effects on biologyRadiation Therapy and Dosimetry

Space radiation does not induce a significant increase of intrachromosomal exchanges in astronauts’ lymphocytes

Horstmann, M., Durante, M., Johannes, C., Pieper, R., Obe, G.·2005·Radiation and Environmental Biophysics

Abstract

Chromosome aberration analysis in astronauts has been used to provide direct, biologically motivated estimates of equivalent doses and risk associated to cosmic radiation exposure during space flight. However, the past studies concentrated on measurements of dicentrics and translocations, while chromosome intrachanges (inversions) have never been measured in astronauts' samples. Recent data reported in the literature suggest that densely ionizing radiation can induce a large fraction of intrachanges, thus leading to the suspicion that interchanges grossly underestimate the cosmic radiation-induced cytogenetic damage in astronauts. We have analyzed peripheral blood lymphocytes from 11 astronauts involved in short- or long-term space flights in low-Earth orbit using high-resolution multicolor banding to assess the frequency of intrachromosomal exchanges in both pre- and post-flight samples. We did not detect any inversions in chromosome 5 from a total of 2800 cells in astronauts' blood. In addition, no complex type exchanges were found in a total of 3590 astronauts' lymphocytes analyzed by multifluor fluorescence in situ hybridisation. We conclude that, within the statistical power of this study, the analysis of interchanges for biological dosimetry in astronauts does not significantly underestimate the space radiation-induced cytogenetic damage, and complex-type exchanges or intrachanges have limited practical use for biodosimetry at very low doses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00411-005-0017-0

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interpretation of studies on chromosomal aberrations in astronauts and cosmonauts is limited by significant individual variability and insufficient statistical power.

    “However, interpretation of these studies is limited by significant individual variability and insufficient statistical power [37,38,39,40].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horstmann, M., Durante, M., Johannes, C., Pieper, R., & Obe, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Corresponding author
Durante, M.
Venue
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics
Published
2005-10-11
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
219-224
ISSN
  • 0301-634X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2099
OpenAlex
W1977768506
Cited by
32
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Radiation and Environmental Biophysics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Keywords
space radiation, cosmic rays, astronauts, lymphocytes, chromosomal inversions, chromosomal abnormalities, biological dosimetry, low Earth orbit, chromosome 5, fluorescence in situ hybridization, radiation-induced chromosome damage
MeSH terms
Cells, Cultured, Chromosome Aberrations, Chromosomes, Cosmic Radiation, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Humans, Lymphocytes, Radiation Dosage, Radiometry, Relative Biological Effectiveness, Space Flight, Astronauts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review