Cited by 26Effects of Radiation ExposureCarcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentSpaceflight effects on biology

Chromosome aberrations of clonal origin are present in astronauts’ blood lymphocytes

George, K., Durante, M., Willingham, V., Cucinotta, F.A.·2004·Cytogenetic and Genome Research

Abstract

Radiation-induced chromosome translocations remain in peripheral blood cells over many years, and can potentially be used to measure retrospective doses or prolonged low-dose rate exposures. However, several recent studies have indicated that some individuals possess clones of cells with balanced chromosome abnormalities, which can result in an overestimation of damage and, therefore, influence the accuracy of dose calculations. We carefully examined the patterns of chromosome damage found in the blood lymphocytes of twelve astronauts, and also applied statistical methods to screen for the presence of potential clones. Cells with clonal aberrations were identified in three of the twelve individuals. These clonal cells were present in samples collected both before and after space flight, and yields are higher than previously reported for healthy individuals in this age range (40-52 years of age). The frequency of clonal damage appears to be even greater in chromosomes prematurely condensed in interphase, when compared with equivalent analysis in metaphase cells. The individuals with clonal aberrations were followed-up over several months and the yields of all clones decreased during this period. Since clonal aberrations may be associated with increased risk of tumorigenesis, it is important to accurately identify cells containing clonal rearrangements for risk assessment as well as biodosimetry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000077498

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interpretation of studies on chromosomal aberrations in astronauts and cosmonauts is limited by significant individual variability and insufficient statistical power.

    “However, interpretation of these studies is limited by significant individual variability and insufficient statistical power [37,38,39,40].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
George, K., Durante, M., Willingham, V., & Cucinotta, F. A.
Affiliations
  • Wyle (United States) (US)
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
  • Johnson Space Center (US)
Venue
Cytogenetic and Genome Research
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2004
Volume
104
Issue
1-4
Pages
245-251
ISSN
  • 1424-859X (ISSN-L)
  • 1424-8581
OpenAlex
W2059884587
Cited by
26
References
21
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cytogenetic and Genome Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
Keywords
clonal chromosomal abnormalities, astronauts, space radiation exposure, blood lymphocytes, biological dosimetry, low-dose-rate exposure
MeSH terms
Adult, Chromosome Aberrations, Chromosomes, Human, Clone Cells, Humans, Lymphocytes, Middle Aged, Space Flight, Translocation, Genetic, Occupational Exposure, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Astronauts, Chromosome Breakage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review