Cited by 54Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Disease-specific profiles of apathy in Alzheimer’s disease and behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia differ across the disease course

Wei, Grace, Irish, Muireann, Hodges, John R., Piguet, Olivier, Kumfor, Fiona·2020·Journal of Neurology

Abstract

Apathy is one of the most prevalent and disabling non-cognitive symptoms of dementia. This loss of motivation and pervasive decline in goal-directed behaviour represents a core diagnostic feature of behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) and is also common in Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, despite growing recognition of a multidimensional model, apathy has typically been examined as a unitary symptom. Here, we employed a cross-sectional design to characterise the multidimensional nature of apathy across syndromes and disease course. 92 participants (44 bvFTD, 20 AD, 28 controls) completed the Dimensional Apathy Scale (DAS) to quantify emotional, executive, and initiation apathy. Patients were divided into early and late stages based on time since symptom onset. All participants underwent structural MRI and voxel-based morphometry was used to identify neural correlates of apathy dimensions. In the early stage of the disease (< 5 years since onset), emotional apathy was greater in bvFTD than AD. In contrast, in the late stage (> 5 years since onset), executive apathy was greater in AD than bvFTD, although apathy was elevated across all dimensions compared to controls. Notably, apathy was observed in the absence of self-reported depression in 46.2% of patients, with no patients classified as depressed only. Neuroimaging analyses revealed both common and divergent prefrontal and subcortical neural correlates associated with apathy dimensions. Our results reveal differing profiles of apathy across the disease course, in AD and bvFTD, with distinct brain regions mediating these dimensions. These findings will inform the development of appropriate treatment targets to ameliorate the impact of apathy in dementia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00415-019-09679-1

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wei, G., Irish, M., Hodges, J. R., Piguet, O., & Kumfor, F.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Kumfor, Fiona
Venue
Journal of Neurology
Published
2019-12-23
Volume
267
Issue
4
Pages
1086-1096
ISSN
  • 0012-1037 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-5354
  • 1432-1459
OpenAlex
W2995342297
Cited by
54
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4
FWCI
5.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT1037746, GNT1121791, GNT1106031, GNT1103258)
  • Australian Research Council (FT160100096)
  • Dementia Australia Research Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
apathy, Alzheimer's disease, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, emotional apathy, clinical course, prefrontal cortex, subcortical structures, goal-directed behavior
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Emotions, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Disease Progression, Executive Function, Frontotemporal Dementia, Apathy, Gray Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review