Cited by 141Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyExercise and Physiological ResponsesSports Performance and Training

Effect of an acute period of resistance exercise on excess post-exercise oxygen consumption: implications for body mass management

Schuenke, Mark, Mikat, Richard, McBride, Jeffrey·2002·European Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

Studies have shown metabolism to remain elevated for hours following resistance exercise, but none have gone beyond 16 h, nor have they followed a whole body, high intensity exercise protocol. To examine the duration of excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC) following a period of heavy resistance exercise, seven healthy men [mean (SD) age 22 (3) years, height 177 (8) cm, mass 83 (10) kg, percentage body fat 10.4 (4.2)%] engaged in a 31 min period of resistance exercise, consisting of four circuits of bench press, power cleans, and squats. Each set was performed using the subject's own predetermined ten-repetition maximum and continued until failure. Oxygen consumption ( ) measurements were obtained at consistent times (34 h pre-, 29 h pre-, 24 h pre-, 10 h pre-, 5 h pre-, immediately post-, 14 h post-, 19 h post-, 24 h post-, 38 h post-, 43 h post-, and 48 h post-exercise). Post-exercise measurements were compared to the baseline measurements made at the same time of day. The was significantly elevated ( P<0.05) above baseline values at immediately post, 14, 19, and 38 h post-exercise. Mean daily values for both post-exercise days were also significantly elevated above the mean value for the baseline day. These results suggest that EPOC duration following resistance exercise extends well beyond the previously reported duration of 16 h. The duration and magnitude of the EPOC observed in this study indicates the importance of future research to examine a possible role f…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00421-001-0568-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schuenke, M., Mikat, R., & McBride, J.
Affiliations
  • Ohio University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–La Crosse (US)
Corresponding author
Schuenke, Mark
Venue
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2002-03-01
Volume
86
Issue
5
Pages
411-417
ISSN
  • 0020-9376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-6319
  • 1439-6327
OpenAlex
W1977774021
Cited by
141
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
8.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
excess post-exercise oxygen consumption, resistance training, high-intensity training, post-exercise metabolism, weight management, oxygen consumption, power clean, bench press, squatting
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Circadian Rhythm, Exercise Test, Humans, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Endurance, Reference Values, Time Factors, Weight Lifting, Reproducibility of Results, Weight Loss, Exercise, Weight-Bearing, Muscle Fatigue

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review