Cited by 368Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Functions and MemoryHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Strategy application disorder: the role of the frontal lobes in human multitasking

Burgess, Paul W.·2000·Psychological Research

Abstract

Strategy application disorder is a term used to describe a pattern of deficits, usually associated with frontal lobe dysfunction, where people show disorganisation, absentmindedness and problems with planning and decision making in everyday life despite normal performance on traditional neuropsychological tests. It is argued that the prototypical situation which presents problems for these cases are those which require multitasking, and although good cases are rare in the literature, those that do exist show a characteristic neuropsychological pattern. Moreover, this pattern is confirmed in recent group studies of multitasking and of the relationship between multitasking tests (such as the Six Element Test), failures in everyday life and other neuropsychological measures. At present the evidence suggests that the potential frontal brain regions most implicated in multitasking are the anterior cingulate; B.A. 10 and immediately adjacent areas; and the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, with each making a unique contribution to different aspects of performance. Furthermore, recent studies show striking dissociations between performances on multitasking tests and two of the most commonly administered measures of executive function: the verbal fluency test and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, which sets a minimum level for a fractionation of the executive syndrome in humans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s004269900006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with damage to rostral prefrontal cortex show disorganization in everyday life.

    “patients with damage to this region show disorganization in everyday life (Burgess, 2000; Uretzky & Gilboa, 2010)”

    From Strategic offloading of delayed intentions into the external environment (2015) · cites this paper as Burgess, 2000

  • Rostral prefrontal cortex appears to play a prominent role in prospective memory in everyday life as well as in remembering intentions for just a few seconds.

    “For example, rostral prefrontal cortex appears to play a prominent role in prospective memory in everyday life (Burgess, 2000; Uretzky & Gilboa, 2010) as well as remembering intentions for just a few seconds (Gilbert, 2011), whereas more posterior frontal regions respond more strongly to standard working memory tasks (Reynolds, West, & Braver, 2009).”

    From Strategic offloading of delayed intentions into the external environment (2015) · cites this paper as Burgess, 2000

  • Multitasking has been shown to be impaired in patients with acquired frontal lobe damage (particularly rostral prefrontal cortex), even when executive function deficit is small or undetectable using traditional neuropsychological tests.

    “For example, multitasking (which requires considerable numbers of executive functions) has been shown to be impaired in patients who have acquired frontal lobe damage (particularly to rostral prefrontal cortex), even when an executive function deficit is small or indeed undetectable using traditional neuropsychological tests such as theWisconsin Card Sorting test and verbal fluency (e.g. Burgess,”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burgess, P. W.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Burgess, Paul W.
Venue
Psychological Research
Published
2000-08-18
Volume
63
Issue
3-4
Pages
279-288
ISSN
  • 0033-3026 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-0727
  • 1430-2772
OpenAlex
W2098833848
Cited by
368
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 19
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • LG Display
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
frontal lobe dysfunction, multitasking, executive function, anterior cingulate cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, planning and decision-making, verbal fluency, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
MeSH terms
Attention, Dementia, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests, Problem Solving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review