Cited by 228Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Executive processes in Asperger syndrome: Patterns of performance in a multiple case series

Hill, Elisabeth L., Bird, Chris M.·2006·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

Mixed evidence exists for executive dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders (ASD). This may be because of the nature of the tasks used, the heterogeneity of participants, and difficulties with recruiting appropriate control groups. A comprehensive battery of 'executive' tests was administered to 22 individuals with Asperger syndrome and 22 well-matched controls. Performance was analysed both between groups and on an individual basis to identify outliers in both the ASD and control groups. There were no differences between the groups on all 'classical' tests of executive function. However, differences were found on newer tests of executive function. Specifically, deficits in planning, abstract problem solving and especially multitasking. On the tests that discriminated the groups, all of the ASD individuals except one were identified as significantly impaired (i.e. below the 5th percentile of the control mean) on at least one executive measure. This study provides evidence for significant executive dysfunction in Asperger syndrome. Greatest dysfunction appeared in response initiation and intentionality at the highest level--the ability to engage and disengage actions in the service of overarching goals. These deficits are best observed through using more recent, ecologically valid tests of executive dysfunction. Moreover, performance on these measures correlated with autistic symptomatology.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In 22 adults with Asperger syndrome compared with 22 well-matched controls, classical executive tests showed no group differences once psychomotor speed was controlled, but newer tests—especially multitasking and response initiation—revealed significant impairment. On discriminating measures, all but one Asperger participant fell below the 5th percentile of control performance on at least one executive measure, and some deficits correlated with autistic symptomatology.

Key findings

  • Group comparisons showed 11 of 22 executive-function comparisons significant; no differences remained on classical tests (MCST, Stroop, Trail-making, verbal fluency) after controlling for psychomotor speed, except Trail-making differences disappeared when part A was covaried.
  • Significant group differences were found on newer tests: BADS Action Program, Zoo Map, Six Elements, and Hayling test; the Asperger group was also significantly better than controls on BADS Temporal Judgement.
  • Multiple case series identified outliers below the 5th percentile of controls: Six Elements longest time 13/21 (61.90%), Hayling time part 1 8/21 (38.09%), Hayling time part 2 8/21 (38.09%), Hayling overall 8/21 (38.09%), Trail-making part A 13/22 (59.09%), Trail-making part B 7/22 (31.82%), MCST total errors 4/22 (18.18%), MCST perseverations 3/22 (13.64%), verbal fluency 0/21 (0%).
  • Correlations in the Asperger group linked executive measures to autistic symptomatology: AQ with Six Elements tasks completed r(19)=0.57, p<0.01; AQ with Hayling overall r(19)=0.49, p<0.05; Communication Checklist with Action Program r(20)=−0.74, p<0.001; Communication Checklist with Hayling time part 1 r(19)=0.56, p<0.01, part 2 r(19)=0.57, p<0.01, and overall r(19)=−0.69, p<0.001.

Methods

  • Cross-sectional multiple case series: 44 participants—22 high-functioning adults with formal Asperger syndrome diagnosis (16 male, 6 female) and 22 normal adult controls (14 male, 8 female), individually paired to match general ability within four standard score points and, where possible, age and sex.
  • Executive battery included BADS (Rule Shift, Action Program, Key Search, Temporal Judgement, Zoo Map, Six Elements), Hayling test, Modified Card Sorting Test, Stroop, Trail-making, and verbal fluency; autistic symptomatology measured with the Autism Spectrum Quotient and an observer-rated Communication Checklist.
  • Analyses used independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney tests for group comparisons, correlations with AQ and Communication Checklist, and Crawford and Garthwaite’s single-case method against the control group to identify individuals below the 5th percentile.

Limitations

  • The paper states that it did not address potential compensatory strategies that may have affected the adult group’s performance, and that it remains unclear whether the identified executive deficits are causal to autistic disorder.
  • The paper states that the findings may reflect a general dysexecutive syndrome rather than specific deficits, and that further work is needed to validate the Communication Checklist and evaluate the AQ in more detail.
  • Evident from the text: the sample is restricted to high-functioning adults with Asperger syndrome, so findings may not generalize to lower-ability or childhood ASD populations; the study also had small missing data points (one Asperger participant with a stutter, one colour-blind control).

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.007

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

0 of 29 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data
    § Abstract · p. 1

    Performance on these measures correlated with autistic symptomatology.

    “Moreover, performance on these measures correlated with autistic symptomatology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Goldsmiths Research Online · p. 9

    After accounting for slower initiation (Hayling time 1 as covariate), no group differences remained in the latency to respond in the second part of the Hayling test [F(1,40) = 0.07, p = 0.79].

    “Once slower initiation had been accounted for in this way, no group differences remained in the latency to respond in the second part of the test [ F (1,40) = 0.07, p = 0.79].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § 2.1. Group difference analysis · p. 8

    In terms of the classic tests of executive function adopted in the study, only performance on the Trailmaking test distinguished between the two participant groups.

    “In terms of the classic tests of executive function adopted in the study, only performance on the Trailmaking test distinguished between the two participant groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § 2.2. Multiple case series analysis · p. 11

    Outliers are seen in some of the classic tests of executive function, as well as in the newer tests.

    “Here, outliers are seen in some of the classic tests of executive function, as well as in the newer tests.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Abstract · p. 3

    In a pilot study of 35 adults with ASD, large and significant difficulties in areas of daily living associated with executive dysfunction were identified.

    “In a pilot studyweused theDEXin a sample of 35 adults with ASD. Large and significant difficulties in areas of daily living associated with executive dysfunction were identified.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 21
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 23
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 2.1. Group difference analysis · p. 8

    Correlations between latencies on the two parts of the Hayling test were found in the AS group [r(19) = 0.85, p < 0.001] and in the control group [r(20) = 0.45, p < 0.05].

    “Correlations between latencies on the two parts of the test were found in the AS group [ r (19) = 0.85, p < 0.001], and in the control group [ r (20) = 0.45, p < 0.05].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 2.1. Group difference analysis · p. 8

    The AS participants were significantly slower than their peers on both parts of the Trailmaking test.

    “The AS participants were significantly slower than their peers on both parts of this test”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § Goldsmiths Research Online · p. 12

    The number of AS outliers on the Hayling time part 2 was 8 (38.09% of the AS group).

    “| Hayling time part 2 | 21 | 8 (38.09) |”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 2.1. Group difference analysis · p. 8

    As a group, and in relation to a well-matched control group, evidence for intact and impaired ability is identified, with impaired ability being identified predominantly in the newer tests of executive function (the Action Program, Zoo Map and Six Elements subtests of the BADS as well as the Hayling test).

    “Thus as a group, and in relation to a well-matched control group, evidence for intact and impaired ability is identified, with impaired ability being identified predominantly in the newer tests of executive function (the Action Program, Zoo Map and Six Elements subtests of the BADS as well as the Hayling test).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Abstract · p. 1

    On newer tests of executive function, the Asperger syndrome group showed deficits in planning, abstract problem solving, and especially multitasking.

    “However, differences were found on newer tests of executive function. Specifically, deficits in planning, abstract problem solving and especially multitasking.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Goldsmiths Research Online · p. 9

    There was a relationship between performance measures on certain executive tests and both the AQ and the communication checklist, predominantly for the communication checklist (four versus two significant correlations).

    “There was a relationship between performance measures on certain executive tests and both the AQ and the communication checklist, although these were seen predominantly for the latter comparison (four versus two; see Table 4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § Goldsmiths Research Online · p. 12

    The number of AS outliers on the Hayling time part 1 was 8 (38.09% of the AS group).

    “| Hayling time part 1 | 21 | 8 (38.09) |”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 2.1. Group difference analysis · p. 8

    The AS group was significantly slower than their peer group on both parts of the Hayling test (part 1, initiation; part 2, inhibition and strategy formation).

    “the AS group was signifi- cantly slower than their peer group on both parts of this test (part 1, initiation; part 2, inhibition and strategy formation).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 2.1. Group difference analysis · p. 8

    For the most part, the performance of the adults with Asperger syndrome was similar to, or significantly worse than that of their well-matched peers.

    “For the most part, the performance of the adults with Asperger syndrome was similar to, or significantly worse than that of their well-matched peers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 2.1. Group difference analysis · p. 8

    Correlations between performance on the two parts of the Trailmaking test were found in both the AS group [r = 0.59 (20) p < 0.01] and the control group [r = 0.422 (20) p = 0.051], although the latter just failed to reach significance.

    “Correlations between performance on the two parts of the test were found in both the AS group [ r = 0.59 (20) p < 0.01], and the control group [ r = 0.422 (20) p = 0.051], although the latter just failed to reach significance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 3. Discussion · p. 16

    The Six Elements and Hayling tests were sensitive at both a group level and a case-by-case level.

    “These tests were sensitive not only at a group level but also on a case-by-case basis and they correlated with measures of autistic behaviours.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § Goldsmiths Research Online · p. 13

    A 22-year-old female (id103) stopped for long periods of time.

    “Other examples are the case of a 22-year-old female who stopped for long periods of time (id103)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Goldsmiths Research Online · p. 13

    There was a strong correlation between Hayling overall total score and score on the Communication Checklist in those with AS (r(19) = -0.69, p < 0.001), such that those making more errors on the Hayling test were rated as more 'odd' on the communication checklist.

    “there was a strong correlation between Hayling overall total score and score on the Communication Checklist in those with AS (r (19) = -0.69, p &lt; 0.001) such that those making more errors on the Hayling test were rated as more 'odd' on the communication checklist.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § Goldsmiths Research Online · p. 12

    The number of AS outliers on the Trail-making part B was 7 (31.82% of the AS group).

    “| Trail-making part B | 22 | 7 (31.82) |”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Abstract · p. 3

    Standard tests of executive function tend to be complex tasks, where the outcome is the sum of performance of a number of executive processes.

    “Standard tests of executive function tend to be complex tasks, where the outcome is the sum of performance of a number of executive processes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation
    § 1. Method · p. 5

    General ability was assessed using seven subtests of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-III).

    “General ability was assessed using seven subtests of theWechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-III;Wechsler, 1998).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wechsler, 1998

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § 1. Method · p. 5

    In order to be included in the study, each Asperger syndrome participant must have received a previous diagnosis of Asperger syndrome based on APA criteria from an expert psychiatrist or clinical psychologist.

    “In order to be included in the study, each must have received previously a diagnosis of Asperger syndrome based on APA criteria from a psychiatrist or clinical psychologist who was an expert in this area.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § 1. Method · p. 5

    Each adult with Asperger syndrome was paired individually with a control participant, matched for general ability level (within four standard score points) and, where possible, age and sex.

    “Each adult with Asperger syndromewas paired individually with a control participant, to match for general ability level (to within four standard score points) and, where possible, age and sex (see Table 2 for further details).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract · p. 2

    Asperger syndrome can be considered the purest form of autism because it is unimpeded by the learning difficulties common to other parts of the autism spectrum.

    “Asperger syndrome might be considered to be the purest form of autism in the sense that it is unimpeded by the effects of learning difficulty common to other parts of the autism spectrum (Frith, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Frith, 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Abstract · p. 3

    Tower tasks, often taken as a measure of planning, involve a number of processes over and above planning per se, such as working memory and inhibition of prepotent but inefficient sub-goal moves.

    “For example, Tower tasks are often taken as a measure of planning. However, these involve a number of processes over and above planning per se (e.g. working memory, inhibition of prepotent but inefficient sub-goal moves).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract · p. 3

    Aggregating data across a group of individuals requires that all individuals are homogenous with respect to their cognitive profiles, and this cannot be assumed a priori.

    “In fact, it has been argued that aggregating data across a group of individuals requires that all individuals are homogenous with respect to their cognitive profiles, and this cannot be assumed a priori (McCloskey, 2001).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McCloskey, 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning
    § Abstract · p. 2

    If executive dysfunction is a core and causal deficit in ASD, it should be found in all ASD populations irrespective of age and/or general ability.

    “In its strongest form, seeing executive dysfunction as a core and causal deficit in ASD would imply that it should be found in all ASD populations, irrespective of age and/or general ability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract · p. 3

    By careful, detailed analyses of individual cases, rich information can be obtained concerning the range of performance, and the potential of difficulties in a subgroup of individuals.

    “By careful, detailed analyses of individual cases, rich information can be obtained concerning the range of performance, and the potential of difficulties in a subgroup of individuals (Caramazza &McCloskey, 1988; Marshall&Newcombe, 1984; McCloskey, 2001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Caramazza &McCloskey, 1988

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Marshall&Newcombe, 1984

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites McCloskey, 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Abstract · p. 3

    The study conducted both a group analysis of performance on the test battery and a detailed analysis of the 22 individual cases.

    “In the current study we conducted both a group analysis of performance on our test battery and also a detailed analysis of the 22 individual cases.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationown data
    § Abstract · p. 1

    These deficits are best observed through using more recent, ecologically valid tests of executive dysfunction.

    “These deficits are best observed through using more recent, ecologically valid tests of executive dysfunction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning
    § Abstract · p. 2

    If specific executive functions play a causal role in ASD, they would be expected to correlate with severity of autistic symptomatology.

    “Moreover, if specific executive functions play a causal role in ASD, these would be expected to correlate with severity of autistic symptomatology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation
    § Abstract · p. 3

    The Autism Spectrum Quotient and the communication checklist assess day-to-day behaviour and can be seen as an index of autistic symptomatology.

    “Both these tests assess day-today behaviour, and can be seen as an index of autistic symptomatology.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Baron-Cohen, Wheelwright, Skinner, Martin, & Clubley, 2001 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Frith, unpublished

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract · p. 3

    According to parents, individuals aged 10-19 years with Asperger syndrome showed significantly more behaviours associated with dysexecutive syndrome than a typically developing group.

    “Indeed, Channon, Charman, Heap, Crawford, and Rios (2001) reported that according to parents, a group of individuals aged 10-19 years with Asperger syndrome showed significantly more behaviours associated with dysexecutive syndrome than did a typically developing group.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Channon, Charman, Heap, Crawford, and Rios (2001)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § 3. Discussion · p. 19

    It is important to use both between- and within-group analysis methods to identify the extent of executive dysfunction across participants, and to link these to autistic symptomatology.

    “Furthermore, we have highlighted the importance of both between- and within-group analysis methods to identify the extent of executive dysfunction across participants, as well as the need to link these to autistic symptomatology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Communication Checklist validly measures autistic symptomatology.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § 3. Discussion · p. 17

    This study did not address any potential compensatory strategies that may have affected the performance of the adult group.

    “It should be noted, however, that this study did not address any potential compensatory strategies that may have effected the performance of our adult group.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3. Discussion · p. 18

    In typical development, the frontal lobes take the longest to mature postnatally and the rostral prefrontal cortex is one of the last areas to achieve myelination.

    “In typical development, the frontal lobes are those that take the longest to mature postnatally and the rostral prefrontal cortex is one of the last areas to achieve myelination (e.g. Huttenlocher, 1979; Fuster, 1997).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Huttenlocher, 1979 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Fuster, 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation
    § 3. Discussion · p. 16

    An alternative explanation for the findings is a difficulty in goal/sub-goal coordination.

    “An alternative, but perhaps overlapping, explanation would be as a difficulty in goal/sub-goal coordination.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 3. Discussion · p. 18

    Multitasking has been shown to be impaired in patients with acquired frontal lobe damage (particularly rostral prefrontal cortex), even when executive function deficit is small or undetectable using traditional neuropsychological tests.

    “For example, multitasking (which requires considerable numbers of executive functions) has been shown to be impaired in patients who have acquired frontal lobe damage (particularly to rostral prefrontal cortex), even when an executive function deficit is small or indeed undetectable using traditional neuropsychological tests such as theWisconsin Card Sorting test and verbal fluency (e.g. Burgess,”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Burgess, 2000 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § 3. Discussion · p. 19

    The study has provided support for executive dysfunction in a group of adults with Asperger syndrome, suggesting that executive dysfunction is central to the disorder.

    “In summary,we have provided support for executive dysfunction in a group of adults with Asperger syndrome, suggesting that executive dysfunction is central to the disorder.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Communication Checklist validly measures autistic symptomatology.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Goldsmiths Research Online · p. 13

    There is some process involved in the Hayling test that is linked to verbal and non-verbal communication and that when impaired creates a perception of oddness in another person.

    “This suggests that there is some process involved in the Hayling test that is linked to verbal and non-verbal communication and that when impaired creates a perception of oddness in another person.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 3. Discussion · p. 16

    A sub-goal is an essential but indirect part of the solution of a task.

    “According to Ward and Allport (1997), a sub-goal is an essential, but indirect, part of the solution of a task.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ward and Allport (1997)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3. Discussion · p. 16

    Dysexecutive syndrome might fractionate at the behavioural level.

    “Furthermore, Burgess, Alderman, Evans, Emslie, and Wilson's (1998) factor analysis of the DEX questionnaire (see below) and performance on a range of behavioural tests of executive function suggested that dysexecutive syndrome might fractionate at the behavioural level.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Burgess, Alderman, Evans, Emslie, and Wilson's (1998) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3. Discussion · p. 18

    Children with ASD were shown to have difficulties only on tests of planning and cognitive flexibility, while children with ADHD had difficulties only on the test of inhibition.

    “Those with ASD were shown to have difficulties only on the tests of planning and cognitive flexibility, while the children withADHDhad difficulties only on the test of inhibition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ozonoff and Jensen (1999) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § 3. Discussion · p. 18

    The performance of the current adult sample on the Stroop task supports the view that ASD have difficulties only on planning and cognitive flexibility, not inhibition.

    “The performance of the current adult sample on the Stroop task, conceived as a test of inhibition, supports this view.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3. Discussion · p. 18

    Turner (1999) reported a correlational link in autistic individuals between poor performance on ideational and design fluency tasks and high levels of repetitive behaviour in daily life.

    “Turner (1999) reported a correlational link in autistic individuals between poor performance on ideational and design fluency tasks and high levels of repetitive behaviour in daily life.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Turner (1999)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3. Discussion · p. 16

    Children with autism begin to have difficulty on tower-type puzzles only when sub-goal moves are introduced into the puzzles.

    “One of the over-riding conclusions of these studies was that children with autism begin to have difficulty on tower-type puzzles only when sub-goal moves are introduced into the puzzles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sykes (2001)

      Not checked in the free run.

41 of 41
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Traditional tests of executive function may be insensitive in those with a putative developmental executive dysfunction, in a way that they are not in those with acquired executive dysfunction.

    “Furthermore, traditional tests of executive function may be insensitive in those with a putative developmental executive dysfunction, in a way that they are not in those with acquired executive dysfunction.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Communication Checklist validly measures autistic symptomatology.

    “To further strengthen our findings, it will be important to validate the Communication Checklist, and to have more detailed evaluation of the Autism Spectrum Quotient, in order to compare behavioural performance on test measures with subsections of these tests.”
    “Communication Checklist (developed by Uta Frith, unpublished).”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Four studies reported TMT difficulties in participants with autism.

    “By contrast, four studies reported that participants with autism did have difficulties with this task [8,15–17]”

    From The paradox of cognitive flexibility in autism (2009) · cites this paper as [8]

  • Two MCST studies could not differentiate adults with autism (low and high functioning) from typically developing adults.

    “Illustrative in this respect is that two studies that used an adjusted version of this task, the modified card sorting task (MCST) could not differentiate between adults with autism (low [27] and high functioning [8]) and typically developing adults.”

    From The paradox of cognitive flexibility in autism (2009) · cites this paper as [8]

  • Studies using the Trail Making Test report mixed conclusions.

    “Studies using another clinical neuropsychological measure, the trail making test (TMT), report mixed conclusions [8,9,15–17,29].”

    From The paradox of cognitive flexibility in autism (2009) · cites this paper as [8]

  • Using the >3 cutoff, no TMT study provided evidence of cognitive flexibility problems in autism (autism ratios 2.0 or 2.1; schizophrenia >3).

    “If we calculate this ratio (autism groups 2.0 [15,16] or 2.1 [8], schizophrenia groups >3 [16]), none of the studies actually showed evidence for difficulties with cognitive flexibility in autism.”

    From The paradox of cognitive flexibility in autism (2009) · cites this paper as [8]

  • Linking performance on current cognitive flexibility measures to actual behavior has been difficult.

    “It has proven challenging to link performances on the current cognitive flexibility measures to actual behavior [6–10].”

    From The paradox of cognitive flexibility in autism (2009) · cites this paper as [8]

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • ConsistentF(1, 41) = 0.01reported p = .92 · recomputed p = .921

    “F (1,41) = 0.01, p = .92”

  • Consistentr(19) = 0.85reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “r (19) = 0.85, p < .001”

  • Consistentr(20) = 0.45reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .036

    “r (20) = 0.45, p < .05”

  • ConsistentF(1, 40) = 0.07reported p = .79 · recomputed p = .793

    “F (1,40) = 0.07, p = .79”

  • Consistentr(19) = 0.45reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .041

    “r (19) = 0.45, p < .05”

  • Consistentr(19) = 0.19reported p = .42 · recomputed p = .409

    “r (19) = 0.19, p = .42”

  • Consistentr(19) = 0.57reported p < .01 · recomputed p = .007

    “r (19)=0.57, p < .01”

  • Consistentr(19) = 0.49reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .024

    “r (19) =0.49, p < .05”

  • Consistentr(20) = -0.74reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “r (20) =−0.74, p < .001”

  • Consistentr(19) = 0.56reported p < .01 · recomputed p = .008

    “r (19)=0.56, p < .01”

  • Consistentr(19) = -0.69reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “r (19)= −0.69, p < .001”

11 of 11

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Abell, 1999, The neuroanatomy of autism: a voxel-based whole brain analysis of structural scans, Neuroreport, 10, 1647, 10.1097/00001756-199906030-00005 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bishop, 2004, Using self-report to identify the broad phenotype in parents of children with autistic spectrum disorders: a study using the Autism-spectrum quotient, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 1431, 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00325.x · DOI
  3. Burgess, 2000, Strategy application disorder: the role of the frontal lobes in human multitasking, Psychological Research, 63, 279, 10.1007/s004269900006 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Cambridge Cognition, 1996
  5. Caramazza, 1988, The case for single-patient studies, Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 517, 10.1080/02643298808253271 · DOI
  6. Carper, 2000, Inverse correlation between frontal lobe and cerebellum sizes in children with autism, Brain, 123, 836, 10.1093/brain/123.4.836 · DOI
  7. Carper, 2002, Cerebral lobes in autism: early hyperplasia and abnormal age effects, Neuroimage, 16, 1038, 10.1006/nimg.2002.1099 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Channon, 2001, Real-life-type problem-solving in Asperger's syndrome, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 461, 10.1023/A:1012212824307 · DOI
  9. Cody, 2002, Structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging of autism, International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 766, 1
  10. Crawford, 2002, Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences, Neuropsychologia, 40, 1196, 10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00224-X · DOI
  11. Frith, 2004, Emmanuel Miller lecture: confusions and controversies about Asperger syndrome, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 659, 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00262.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. Hill, 2004, Evaluating the theory of executive dysfunction in autism, Developmental Review, 24, 189, 10.1016/j.dr.2004.01.001 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hill, 2004, Executive dysfunction in autism, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 26, 10.1016/j.tics.2003.11.003 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Huttenlocher, 1979, Synapticdensity in human frontal cortex—developmental changes and effects of aging, Brain Research, 163, 195, 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90349-4 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Klin, 2003, The enactive mind, or from actions to cognition: lessons from autism, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, 358, 345, 10.1098/rstb.2002.1202 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Lopez, 2005, Examining the relationship between executive functions and restricted, repetitive symptoms of autistic disorder, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 445, 10.1007/s10803-005-5035-x · DOI · Paper page
  17. Lord, 2000, The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: a standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 205, 10.1023/A:1005592401947 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Marshall, 1984, Putative problems and pure progress in neuropsychological single-case studies, Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 6, 65, 10.1080/01688638408401197 · DOI
  19. Meiran, 2002, Consciousness and control in task switching, Conscious Cognition, 11, 10, 10.1006/ccog.2001.0521 · DOI
  20. Minshew, 1995, Speech and language in high-functioning autistic individuals, Neuropsychology, 9, 255, 10.1037/0894-4105.9.2.255 · DOI
  21. Minshew, 1992, Neuropsychological functioning in nonmentally retarded autistic individuals, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 14, 749, 10.1080/01688639208402860 · DOI
  22. Nelson, 1976, A modified card sorting test sensitive to frontal lobe defects, Cortex, 12, 313, 10.1016/S0010-9452(76)80035-4 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Odhuba, 2005, Ecological validity of measures of executive functioning, British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 269, 10.1348/014466505X29431 · DOI
  24. Rajendran, 2005, How do individuals with Asperger syndrome respond to nonliteral language and inappropriate requests in computer-mediated communication, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 429, 10.1007/s10803-005-5033-z · DOI
  25. Ramus, 2003, Theories of developmental dyslexia: insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults, Brain, 126, 841, 10.1093/brain/awg076 · DOI
  26. Robertson, 1997, ‘Oops!’: performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects, Neuropsychologia, 35, 747, 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00015-8 · DOI
  27. Rumsey, 1985, Conceptual problem-solving in highly verbal nonretarded autistic men, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 15, 23, 10.1007/BF01837896 · DOI
  28. Rumsey, 1988, Neuropsychological findings in high-functioning men with infantile autism, residual state, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10, 201, 10.1080/01688638808408236 · DOI
  29. Rumsey, 1990, Neuropsychological divergence of high-level autism and severe dyslexia, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 20, 155, 10.1007/BF02284715 · DOI
  30. Shallice, 2002, Executive function profile of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Developmental Neuropsychology, 21, 43, 10.1207/S15326942DN2101_3 · DOI
  31. Siklos, 2004, Assessing multitasking in children with ADHD using a modified six elements test, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 347, 10.1016/S0887-6177(03)00071-4 · DOI
  32. Smith, 2004, Neural correlates of switching set as measured in fast, event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging, Human Brain Mapping, 21, 247, 10.1002/hbm.20007 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Sykes, E. D. A. (2001). Planning in autism: the role of working memory. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
  34. Turner, 1999, Generating novel ideas: fluency performance in high-functioning and learning disabled individuals with autism, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 189, 10.1111/1469-7610.00432 · DOI
  35. Ward, G. (1993). An experimental investigation of executive processes. Unpublished D.Phil. Thesis. University of Oxford.
  36. Ward, 1997, Planning and problem-solving using the five-disc Tower of London task, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 49, 10.1080/713755681 · DOI
  37. Woodbury-Smith, 2005, Screening adults for Asperger syndrome using the AQ: a preliminary study of its diagnostic validity in clinical practice, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 331, 10.1007/s10803-005-3300-7 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hill, E. L., & Bird, C. M.
Affiliations
  • University of London (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Hill, Elisabeth L.
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
44
Issue
14
Pages
2822-2835
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105414250
Cited by
228
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 17
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Goldsmiths Research Online (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
Asperger syndrome, executive function, executive dysfunction, autism spectrum disorder, planning, multitasking, response initiation, intentionality, autistic symptomatology
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Autistic Disorder, Developmental Disabilities, Communication, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Problem Solving, Severity of Illness Index, Verbal Behavior, Case-Control Studies, Statistics, Nonparametric, Asperger Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review