Cited by 25Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesSchizophrenia research and treatmentHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

The role of executive functions in psychiatric disorders

Testa, Renée, Pantelis, Christos·2009·The Neuropsychology of Mental Illness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511642197.012

Cites

226 of 226 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Impairments in executive functioning, such as working memory or attention, could potentially explain the effects of information presentation and number of decisions on capacity.

    “Both factors could be potentially explained by impairments in executive functioning, such as working memory or attention, that has been widely reported in psychiatric patients (Testa & Pantelis, 2009;Yaple et al., 2021).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Testa, R., & Pantelis, C.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
The Neuropsychology of Mental Illness
Published
2009-10-01
Pages
117-137
OpenAlex
W2495252509
Cited by
25
References
225
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.45
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
executive function, mental illness, cognitive control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review