Cited by 94Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismLanguage, Metaphor, and Cognition

General and specialized brain correlates for analogical reasoning: A meta‐analysis of functional imaging studies

Open access
Hobeika, Lucie, Diard‐Detoeuf, Capucine, Garcin, Béatrice, Levy, Richard, Volle, Emmanuelle·2016·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Reasoning by analogy allows us to link distinct domains of knowledge and to transfer solutions from one domain to another. Analogical reasoning has been studied using various tasks that have generally required the consideration of the relationships between objects and their integration to infer an analogy schema. However, these tasks varied in terms of the level and the nature of the relationships to consider (e.g., semantic, visuospatial). The aim of this study was to identify the cerebral network involved in analogical reasoning and its specialization based on the domains of information and task specificity. We conducted a coordinate‐based meta‐analysis of 27 experiments that used analogical reasoning tasks. The left rostrolateral prefrontal cortex was one of the regions most consistently activated across the studies. A comparison between semantic and visuospatial analogy tasks showed both domain‐oriented regions in the inferior and middle frontal gyri and a domain‐general region, the left rostrolateral prefrontal cortex, which was specialized for analogy tasks. A comparison of visuospatial analogy to matrix problem tasks revealed that these two relational reasoning tasks engage, at least in part, distinct right and left cerebral networks, particularly separate areas within the left rostrolateral prefrontal cortex. These findings highlight several cognitive and cerebral differences between relational reasoning tasks that can allow us to make predictions about the respective roles of distinct brain regions or networks. These results also provide new, testable anatomical hypotheses about reasoning disorders that are induced by brain damage. Hum Brain Mapp 37:1953–1969, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.23149

Cites

125 of 125 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By synthesizing semantic and visuospatial analogy tasks, Hobeika et al. (2016) observed domain-oriented regions in the inferior and middle frontal gyri.

    “By synthesizing semantic and visuospatial analogy tasks, Hobeika et al. (2016) observed that there were domain-oriented regions in the inferior and middle frontal gyri.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hobeika, L., Diard‐Detoeuf, C., Garcin, B., Levy, R., & Volle, E.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Inserm, U 1127 Paris 75013 France
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03-25
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
1953-1969
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2307298304
Cited by
94
References
125
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR‐09‐RPDOC‐004‐01)
  • Center for Drug Discovery, Baylor College of Medicine
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Keywords
analogical reasoning, rostrolateral prefrontal cortex, semantic analogy, relational reasoning, brain networks
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Concept Formation, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Problem Solving, Semantics, Space Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review