Cited by 56Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural MechanismsMedical and Biological Sciences

Comparison of (stereotactic) parcellations in mouse prefrontal cortex

Open access
Van De Werd, Henri J. J. M., Uylings, Harry B. M.·2014·Brain Structure and Function

Abstract

This study compares the cytoarchitectonic parcellation of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) in the mouse as presented in publications that are commonly used for identifying brain areas. Agreement was found to be greater for boundaries in the medial PFC than in the lateral PFC and lowest for those in the orbital areas of the PFC. In this review, we explain and illustrate in a selected series of photographs and stereotactic pictures the differences in location and terminology of the different prefrontal cortical areas. The significance of cytoarchitectonic parcellation is discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00429-013-0630-7

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mPFC can be parsed into distinct subregions on the basis of their cytoarchitectures, which are consistent with divergent functions among these regions.

    “The mPFC can be parsed into distinct subregions on the basis of their cytoarchitectures, which are consistent with divergent functions among these regions100.”

    From Resolving the neural circuits of anxiety (2015) · cites this paper as [100]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van De Werd, H. J. J. M., & Uylings, H. B. M.
Affiliations
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Uylings, Harry B. M.
Venue
Brain Structure and Function
Published
2013-09-27
Volume
219
Issue
2
Pages
433-459
ISSN
  • 1863-2653 (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-2661
OpenAlex
W1978481169
Cited by
56
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Structure and Function (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH61578, R01MH061578)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Medical and Biological Sciences
Keywords
prefrontal cortex, mouse brain, medial prefrontal cortex, lateral prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Mapping, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Species Specificity, Stereotaxic Techniques, Prefrontal Cortex, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review