CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 506Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement DisordersNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chapter 5 The anatomical relationship of the prefrontal cortex with the striatopallidal system, the thalamus and the amygdala: evidence for a parallel organization

Groenewegen, Henk J., Berendse, Henk W., Wolters, Jan G., Lohman, Anthony H.M.·1991·Progress in brain research
DOI 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)62677-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Recent findings in primates indicate that the connections of the frontal lobe, the basal ganglia, and the thalamus are organized in a number of parallel, functionally segregated circuits. In the present account, we have focused on the organization of the connections between the prefrontal cortex, the basal ganglia and the mediodorsal thalamic nucleus in the rat. It is concluded that in this species, in analogy with the situation in primates, a number of parallel basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuits exist. Furthermore, data are presented indicating that the projections from particular parts of the amygdala and from individual nuclei of the midline and intralaminar thalamic complex to the prefrontal cortex and the striatum are in register with the arrangements in the parallel circuits. These findings emphasize that the functions of the different subregions of the prefrontal cortex cannot be considered separately but must be viewed as components of the integrative functions of the circuits in which they are involved.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)62677-1

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Via the nucleus accumbens, the prefrontal cortex and hippocampal formation can influence striato-pallido-thalamo-cortical circuits involving the ventral pallidum, subthalamic nucleus, ventral tegmental area, substantia nigra and thalamic areas.

    “Via the nucleus accumbens, the prefrontal cortex and hippocampal formation can influence striato-pallido-thalamo-cortical circuits involving the ventral pallidum, subthalamic nucleus, ventral tegmental area, substantia nigra and thalamic areas [21, 22].”

    From Linking haploinsufficiency of the autism- and schizophrenia-associated gene Cyfip1 with striatal-limbic-cortical network dysfunction and cognitive inflexibility (2024) · cites this paper as [21]

  • Prelimbic prefrontal cortex and dorsomedial striatum both support goal-directed action, in line with the anatomical connectivity between these regions.

    “The fact that prelimbic prefrontal cortex and dorsomedial striatum both support goal-directed action is in line with the anatomical connectivity between these regions (Groenewegen et al., 1990; McGeorge and Faull, 1989).”

    From Goals and Habits in the Brain (2013) · cites this paper as Groenewegen et al., 1990

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Groenewegen, 1988, Organization of the afferent connections of the mediodorsal thalamic nucleus in the rat, related to the mediodorsal-prefrontal topography, Neuroscience, 24, 379, 10.1016/0306-4522(88)90339-9 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Herkenham, 1977, Afferent connections of the habenular nuclei in the rat. A horseradish peroxidase study, with a note on the fiber-of-passage problem, J. Comp. Neurol., 173, 123, 10.1002/cne.901730107 · DOI
  3. Selemon, 1985, Longitudinal topography and interdigitation of corticostriatal projections in the rhesus monkey, J. Neurosci., 5, 776, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-03-00776.1985 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Groenewegen, H. J., Berendse, H. W., Wolters, J. G., & Lohman, A. H. M.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Neurology, Inc (US)
Corresponding author
Groenewegen, Henk J.
ORCID
Venue
Progress in brain research
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
1991
Volume
85
Pages
95-118
ISSN
0079-6123 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0079-6123(08)62677-1
OpenAlex
W971185581
Cited by
506
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 16
FWCI
37.17
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in brain research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
prefrontal cortex, thalamus, amygdala, basal ganglia, thalamocortical circuits, parallel circuits, corticostriatal projections, midline thalamic nuclei, intralaminar nuclei, dopaminergic system
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Corpus Striatum, Frontal Lobe, Globus Pallidus, Thalamus, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review