Cited by 32Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Early-in-life neuroanatomical and behavioural trajectories in a triple transgenic model of Alzheimer’s disease

Kong, Vincent, Devenyi, Gabriel A., Gallino, Daniel, Ayranci, Gülebru, Germann, Jürgen, Rollins, Colleen, Chakravarty, M. Mallar·2018·Brain Structure and Function

Abstract

Animal models of Alzheimer's disease (AD) can be used to determine the progressive neurodegeneration characteristics of AD in vivo using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Given the need for therapeutic interventions before the onset of frank AD, it is critical to examine if AD models demonstrate neuroanatomical remodeling in an equivalent preclinical phase. This manuscript examines the trajectories of brain and behavioural changes in the Triple transgenic mouse model (3xTg) prior to the development of AD-like behaviours. The 3xTg mimics both β-amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles through three mutations associated with familial AD, namely: PS1 M146V , APP Swe , and tau P301L transgenes. We performed detailed investigation using longitudinal structural MRI at 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks old to assess neuroanatomical changes using volumetric and deformation-based analyses. Learning- and memory-related behaviour were assessed through the Morris water maze at 9, 17, and 25 weeks of age. There was the absence of major memory deficits with the notable exception of water maze conducted at 17 weeks old, where 3xTg group spent significantly less time in the quadrant of interest in the probe trial. Through volumetric and deformation-based analyses, we observed relative decrease over time in the 3xTg group in the third ventricle, piriform cortex, fornix, and fimbria relative to the control group. We also observed decreases over time in the control mice in the hippocampus, ento…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00429-018-1691-4

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brain-wide volume measurements have yielded inconsistent results in the 3×Tg-AD model, with some studies reporting volumetric changes and others finding no significant differences.

    “Although most studies have reported volumetric changes throughout various brain regions over time (including both decreases and increases) (Kong et al., 2018; Chiquita et al., 2019; Rollins et al., 2019; Güell-Bosch et al., 2020), others have found no significant differences in brain volume between 3×Tg-AD mice and controls (Kastyak-Ibrahim et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2015; Montoliu-Gaya et al., 2018”
  • Longitudinal studies have revealed significant changes in brain volumes (both increases and decreases) in 3×Tg-AD mice during the early stages from 1.5 months to 6 months of age.

    “Longitudinal studies have revealed significant changes in brain volumes (both increases and decreases) in 3×Tg-AD mice during the early stages from 1.5 months to 6 months of age (Kong et al., 2018; Rollins et al., 2019).”
  • Previous studies on 3×Tg-AD mice have reported significant volumetric decreases and WM microstructural abnormalities in the corpus callosum and internal capsule compared with controls.

    “Previous studies on 3×Tg-AD mice have reported significant volumetric decreases (Kong et al., 2018) and WM microstructural abnormalities (Praet et al., 2018; Gatto et al., 2019; Bergamino et al., 2023) in the CC and internal capsule compared with controls.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kong, V., Devenyi, G. A., Gallino, D., Ayranci, G., Germann, J., Rollins, C., & Chakravarty, M. M.
Affiliations
Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
Corresponding author
Chakravarty, M. Mallar
Venue
Brain Structure and Function
Published
2018-06-13
Volume
223
Issue
7
Pages
3365-3382
ISSN
  • 1863-2653 (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-2661
OpenAlex
W2808452326
Cited by
32
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Structure and Function (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fondation Brain Canada
  • CIHR
  • NSERC
  • Weston Brain Institute
  • FQRNT
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, triple transgenic mouse model, 3xTg-AD mice, preclinical neurodegeneration, brain volume changes, deformation-based morphometry, spatial memory impairment, Morris water maze, amyloid plaques, tau pathology, neurodevelopmental delay, hippocampus, piriform cortex, fornix, fimbria, longitudinal structural MRI
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Female, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Mutation, Phenotype, Time Factors, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Neurofibrillary Tangles, tau Proteins, Maze Learning, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Presenilin-1, Mice, 129 Strain, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review