Cited by 159Cancer survivorship and carePain Management and Opioid UseCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Symptom clusters in cancer patients

Chen, Mei-Ling, Tseng, Ho-Ching·2006·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Goals of work Cancer patients often experience multiple symptoms, many of which have been reported to correlate with each other. The goals of this study were to understand which cancer-related symptoms cluster together and to test the conceptual meanings of the revealed symptom clusters.Patients and methods Patients with various cancer diagnoses (N=151) were recruited from a medical center in northern Taiwan. The 13-item M.D. Anderson symptom inventory was used to assess patients' symptom severity. Selected symptoms were factored using principal-axis factoring with oblique rotation. The known-group technique was used to validate the conceptual meanings of revealed factors.Main results Patients' symptom severity ratings fit a three-factor solution that explained 55% of the variance. These three factors (symptom clusters) were named sickness symptom cluster, gastrointestinal symptom cluster, and emotional symptom cluster. Patients with pain and with advanced diseases had significantly higher mean scores in the sickness symptom cluster than patients without pain and with earlier-stage diseases. The patients' functional status was negatively correlated with mean scores in the sickness symptom cluster. Patients under chemotherapy demonstrated significantly higher mean scores in the gastrointestinal symptom cluster than patients under other treatments. Patients with anxiety or depression also had significantly higher mean scores in the emotional symptom cluster than patients without anxiety or depression.Conclusions This study identified three underlying symptom clusters and verified their conceptual meaning in cancer patients. Knowing these symptom clusters may help healthcare professionals understand plausible mechanisms for the aggregation of symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-006-0019-8

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, M.-L., & Tseng, H.-C.
Affiliations
  • Chang Gung University (TW)
  • Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center (TW)
Corresponding author
Chen, Mei-Ling
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2006-02-21
Volume
14
Issue
8
Pages
825-830
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W1996624485
Cited by
159
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
FWCI
6.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Chang Gung University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
cancer symptoms, symptom clusters, symptom severity, gastrointestinal symptoms, emotional symptoms, pain, chemotherapy, anxiety, depression, functional status, disease stage, MD Anderson Symptom Inventory
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Research Design, Severity of Illness Index, Taiwan, Multivariate Analysis, Cluster Analysis, Karnofsky Performance Status

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review