Cited by 31Cancer survivorship and careReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPalliative and Oncologic Care

Quality of life (QOL), supportive care, and spirituality in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients

Sirilla, Janet, Overcash, Janine·2013·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

For many patients, a hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) can be challenging to physical and emotional health. Supportive care needs can be overwhelming for many patients and families. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of quality of life (QOL), spiritual well-being, and supportive care resources post-HSCT. This descriptive, repeated-measures study included people over the age of 18 years undergoing HSCT for any cancer diagnosis. The Functional Assessment in Cancer Therapy--Bone Marrow Transplant scale, the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy--Spiritual--12 scale, and a resource questionnaire were administered prior to HSCT and following HSCT at 30, 60, 90, and 180 days. Three groups of HSCT patients were examined: allogeneic, autologous, and overall. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and correlations. In the sample (n = 159), the autologous HSCT group reported the highest QOL scores. Spirituality scores increased for the autologous HSCT group at 90 days, but decreased for the overall and allogeneic groups. The type of supportive care resources most used were information from the physician and nurse, the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Support as the most used form of support group, and Faith, Prayer and Spiritual Healing. QOL and spiritual well-being scores correlated best at 180 days (6 months) for autologous and allogeneic patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-012-1637-y

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sirilla, J., & Overcash, J.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Overcash, Janine
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2012-10-30
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
1137-1144
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W2086281188
Cited by
31
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, quality of life, spiritual well-being, supportive care, allogeneic stem cell transplantation, autologous stem cell transplantation, cancer patients, support groups, spiritual healing, post-transplant recovery
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, United States, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Spirituality, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review