Cited by 154Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyCancer survivorship and carePalliative and Oncologic Care

Religious Struggle and Religious Comfort in Response to Illness: Health Outcomes among Stem Cell Transplant Patients

Sherman, Allen C., Simonton, Stephanie, Latif, Umaira, Spohn, Rebecca, Tricot, Guido·2005·Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Growing interest has focused on relationships between health and religious coping among cancer patients. However, little is known about the health correlates of negative or conflicted religious responses. The current study examined general religiousness and two modes of cancer-specific religious coping, drawing closer to faith (positive) and struggling with faith (negative), among 213 multiple myeloma patients evaluated at the same point in treatment, during their initial work-up for autologous stem cell transplantation. The outcomes assessed included standardized measures and clinician ratings of depression, general distress, physical functioning, mental health functioning, pain, and fatigue. Results indicated that, after adjusting for relevant control variables, negative religious coping was associated with significantly poorer functioning on all outcomes but one: depression, distress, mental health, pain, and fatigue. Neither general religiousness nor positive religious coping was significantly related to any of the outcomes measured. Results highlight the role of negative or ambivalent religious responses to illness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10865-005-9006-7

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Spiritual distress is associated with increased depression and decreased adherence to medication and medical advice among cancer patients.

    “spiritual distress, or feelings of abandonment by God and/or one's religious community, is associated with increased depression and decreased adherence to medication and medical advice among cancer patients, suggesting a plausible pathway by which such an association could occur.16, 33, 34”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sherman, A. C., Simonton, S., Latif, U., Spohn, R., & Tricot, G.
Affiliations
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Sherman, Allen C.
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2005-07-28
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
359-367
ISSN
  • 0160-7715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3521
OpenAlex
W2103477933
Cited by
153
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
religious coping, negative religious coping, positive religious coping, multiple myeloma, autologous stem cell transplantation, cancer patients, depression, fatigue, pain, physical function, mental health
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Attitude to Health, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Myeloma, Surveys and Questionnaires, Religion, Transplantation, Autologous, Critical Illness, Treatment Outcome, Stem Cell Transplantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review