Cited by 46Nursing care and researchCancer survivorship and carePalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Improving psychosocial outcomes for caregivers of people with poor prognosis gastrointestinal cancers: a randomized controlled trial (Family Connect)

Shaw, Joanne M., Young, Jane M., Butow, Phyllis N., Badgery-Parker, Tim, Durcinoska, Ivana, Harrison, James D., Davidson, Patricia M., Martin, David +7 more·2016·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Purpose This study investigated the effectiveness of a structured telephone intervention for caregivers of people diagnosed with poor prognosis gastrointestinal cancer to improve psychosocial outcomes for both caregivers and patients.Methods Caregivers of patients starting treatment for upper gastrointestinal or Dukes D colorectal cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to the Family Connect telephone intervention or usual care. Caregivers in the intervention group received four standardized telephone calls in the 10 weeks following patient hospital discharge. Caregivers' quality of life (QOL), caregiver burden, unmet supportive care needs and distress were assessed at 3 and 6 months. Patients' QOL, unmet supportive care needs, distress and health service utilization were also assessed at these time points.Results Caregivers (128) were randomized to intervention or usual care groups. At 3 months, caregiver QOL scores and other caregiver-reported outcomes were similar in both groups. Intervention group participants experienced a greater sense of social support (p = .049) and reduced worry about finances (p = .014). Patients whose caregiver was randomized to the intervention also had fewer emergency department presentations and unplanned hospital readmissions at 3 months post-discharge (total 17 vs. 5, p = .01).Conclusions This standardized intervention did not demonstrate any significant improvements in caregiver well-being but did result in a decrease in patient emergency department presentations and unplanned hospital readmissions in the immediate post-discharge period. The trend towards improvements in a number of caregiver outcomes and the improvement in health service utilization support further development of telephone-based caregiver-focused supportive care interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-015-2817-3

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shaw, J. M., Young, J. M., Butow, P. N., Badgery-Parker, T., Durcinoska, I., Harrison, J. D., Davidson, P. M., Martin, D., Sandroussi, C., Hollands, M., Joseph, D., Das, A., Lam, V., Johnston, E., & Solomon, M. J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU)
  • Westmead Hospital (AU)
  • Bankstown Lidcombe Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Shaw, Joanne M.
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2015-06-26
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
585-595
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W925770218
Cited by
46
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Cancer Institute NSW
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
caregiver burden, gastrointestinal cancer, colorectal cancer, upper gastrointestinal cancer, telephone-delivered intervention, psychosocial outcomes, caregiver quality of life, social support, financial worry, emergency department presentation, unplanned hospital readmission, health care utilization, supportive care needs, caregiver distress
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Female, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Readmission, Prognosis, Quality of Life, Social Support, Telephone, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review