Cited by 42Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeCancer survivorship and careHealth Education and Validation

Instruments to measure anxiety in children, adolescents, and young adults with cancer: a systematic review

Lazor, Tanya, Tigelaar, Leonie, Pole, Jason D., De Souza, Claire, Tomlinson, Deborah, Sung, Lillian·2017·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Purpose The primary objective was to describe anxiety measurement instruments used in children and adolescents with cancer or undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and summarize their content and psychometric properties.Methods We conducted searches of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, HAPI, and CINAHL. We included studies that used at least one instrument to measure anxiety quantitatively in children or adolescents with cancer or undergoing HSCT. Two authors independently identified studies and abstracted study demographics and instrument characteristics.Results Twenty-seven instruments, 14 multi-item and 13 single-item, were used between 78 studies. The most commonly used instrument was the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory in 46 studies. Three multi-item instruments (Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale-Mandarin version, PROMIS Pediatric Anxiety Short Form, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) and two single-item instruments (Faces Pain Scale-Revised and 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale, both adapted for anxiety) were found to be reliable and valid in children with cancer.Conclusions We identified 14 different multi-item and 13 different single-item anxiety measurement instruments that have been used in pediatric cancer or HSCT. Only three multi-item and two single-item instruments were identified as being reliable and valid among pediatric cancer or HSCT patients and would therefore be appropriate to measure anxiety in this population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-017-3743-3

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Lazor, T., Tigelaar, L., Pole, J. D., De Souza, C., Tomlinson, D., & Sung, L.
Affiliations
  • Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
  • Pediatric Oncology Group (CA)
Corresponding author
Lazor, Tanya
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2017-06-03
Volume
25
Issue
9
Pages
2921-2931
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W2620909270
Cited by
42
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
anxiety measurement instruments, childhood cancer, adolescents with cancer, young adult cancer, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, psychometric properties, reliability and validity, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale
MeSH terms
Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Psychometrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review