Cited by 181Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryCancer survivorship and careMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Maximizing patient adherence to prehabilitation: what do the patients say?

Ferreira, Vanessa, Agnihotram, Ramanakumar V., Bergdahl, Andreas, van Rooijen, Stefanus J., Awasthi, Rashami, Carli, Francesco, Scheede-Bergdahl, Celena·2018·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Purpose Multimodal prehabilitation programs (exercise, nutrition, and anxiety reduction) have been shown to be successful for enhancing patients' physical function prior to surgery, although adherence remains a challenge. Given the short pre-operative period, maintaining adherence is critical to maximize program effectiveness. This study was designed to better understand patients' perspectives of prehabilitation and to identify factors related to program adherence.Methods A qualitative descriptive study was conducted based on 52 cancer patients enrolled in a prehabilitation program at the Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Canada. Data was collected with a structured questionnaire designed to evaluate the program.Results Patients enjoyed their experience in prehabilitation, especially the exercise program and training sessions. The primary motivating factor for participation was to be physically prepared for the surgery. The most challenging exercise component was resistance training, while the most enjoyed was the aerobic training. Approximately 50% of patients were interested in group fitness classes as opposed to supervised individual training sessions for reasons related to social support. The preferred methods for exercise program delivery were home-based and one supervised exercise session per week. The biggest barrier to participation was related to transportation.Conclusions These findings highlight the need to make prehabilitation programs more patient-centered. This is critical when designing more effective therapeutic strategies tailored to meet patients' specific needs while overcoming program non-adherence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-018-4109-1

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferreira, V., Agnihotram, R. V., Bergdahl, A., van Rooijen, S. J., Awasthi, R., Carli, F., & Scheede-Bergdahl, C.
Affiliations
  • Montreal General Hospital (CA)
  • McGill University Health Centre (CA)
  • Concordia University (CA)
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2018-02-24
Volume
26
Issue
8
Pages
2717-2723
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W2791807193
Cited by
181
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2
FWCI
12.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fondation de l'Hôpital Général de Montréal
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
prehabilitation, patient adherence, cancer surgery, patient perspectives, exercise program, resistance training, aerobic exercise, nutrition, anxiety reduction, social support, home-based exercise, transportation barriers, patient-centered care, barriers to participation
MeSH terms
Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Patient Compliance, Preoperative Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Exercise, Patient Preference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review