Cited by 24Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Early management of type 2 diabetes based on a SMBG strategy: the way to diabetes regression—the St Carlos study: A 3-year, prospective, randomized, clinic-based, interventional study with parallel groups

García de la Torre, Nuria, Durán, Alejandra, del Valle, Laura, Fuentes, Manuel, Barca, Idoya, Martín, Patricia, Montañez, Carmen, Perez-Ferre, Natalia +5 more·2013·Acta Diabetologica

Abstract

The aims are to define the regression rate in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes after lifestyle intervention and pharmacological therapy based on a SMBG (self-monitoring of blood glucose) strategy in routine practice as compared to standard HbA1c-based treatment and to assess whether a supervised exercise program has additional effects. St Carlos study is a 3-year, prospective, randomized, clinic-based, interventional study with three parallel groups. Hundred and ninety-five patients were randomized to the SMBG intervention group [I group; n = 130; Ia: SMBG (n = 65) and Ib: SMBG + supervised exercise (n = 65)] and to the HbA1c control group (C group) (n = 65). The primary outcome was to estimate the regression rate of type 2 diabetes (HbA1c <6 % on metformin treatment). After 3 years of follow-up, diabetes regression was achieved by 56 patients, 6 (9.2 %) from the C group, 21 (32.3 %) from the Ia group and 29 (44.6 %) from the Ib group. RR (95 % CI) for diabetes regression in the intervention group (Ia + Ib) was 4.5 (2.1-9); p < 0.001 and remained after stratification by gender, age and BMI. This difference was associated with healthier changes in lifestyle and greater weight loss. RR for a weight loss >4 kg was 3.6 (1.8-7); p < 0.001. This study shows that the use of SMBG in an educational program effectively increases the regression rate in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients after 3 years of follow-up. These data suggest that SMBG-based programs should be extended to primary care settings where diabetic patients are usually attended.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00592-013-0467-9

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
García de la Torre, N., Durán, A., del Valle, L., Fuentes, M., Barca, I., Martín, P., Montañez, C., Perez-Ferre, N., Abad, R., Sanz, F., Galindo, M., Rubio, M. A., & Calle-Pascual, A. L.
Affiliations
Hospital Clínico San Carlos (ES)
Venue
Acta Diabetologica
Published
2013-03-27
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
607-614
ISSN
  • 0940-5429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-5233
OpenAlex
W1794035978
Cited by
24
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Diabetologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, self-monitoring of blood glucose, newly diagnosed diabetes, supervised exercise, lifestyle intervention, metformin, weight loss, HbA1c, primary care, patient education
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Life Style, Male, Metformin, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review