Cited by 60Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and Research

First-trimester fasting glycemia as a predictor of gestational diabetes (GDM) and adverse pregnancy outcomes

Sesmilo, G., Prats, P., Garcia, S., Rodríguez, I., Rodríguez-Melcón, A., Berges, I., Serra, B.·2020·Acta Diabetologica

Abstract

Aims Studies to prevent gestational diabetes (GDM) have shown the best results when lifestyle measures have been applied early in pregnancy. We aimed to investigate whether first-trimester fasting plasma glucose (FPG) could predict GDM risk and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Methods A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from singleton pregnancies who were attended at our hospital between 2008 and 2018 (n = 27,198) was performed. We included patients with a recorded first-trimester FPG and complete pregnancy data (n = 6845). Patients under 18, with pregestational diabetes or reproductive techniques, were excluded. First-trimester FPG was evaluated as a continuous variable and divided into quartiles. GDM was diagnosed by NDDG criteria. The relationship between first- and second-trimester glucose > 92 mg/dL was also investigated. The relationship between FPG and pregnancy outcomes was assessed in 6150 patients who did not have GDM. Results Maternal age was 34.2 ± 3.9 years, BMI 23.1 ± 3.7 kg/m 2 and mean FPG 83.0 ± 7.3 mg/dL. Glucose quartiles were: ≤ 78, 79-83, 84-87 and ≥ 88 mg/dL. First-trimester FPG predicted the risk of GDM (7%, 8%, 10.2% and 16% in each quartile, p < 0.001) and the risk of second-trimester glucose > 92 mg/dL (2.6%, 3.8%, 6.3% and 11.4% in each quartile, p < 0.001). FPG was significantly associated with LGA (8.2%, 9.3%, 10% and 11.7% in each quartile, p = 0.011) but not with other obstetrical outcomes. In a multivariate analysis including age, BMI, tobacco use, number of pregnancies and weight gained during pregnancy, first-trimester FPG was an independent predictor of LGA. Conclusions First-trimester FPG is an early marker of GDM and LGA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00592-019-01474-8

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many scientific papers emphasize the validity of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in the first trimester of pregnancy.

    “Currently, there are many scientific papers emphasizing the validity of screening for GDM in the first trimester of pregnancy [6,7,8,9].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sesmilo, G., Prats, P., Garcia, S., Rodríguez, I., Rodríguez-Melcón, A., Berges, I., & Serra, B.
Affiliations
Hospital Universitario Dexeus (ES)
Corresponding author
Sesmilo, G.
Venue
Acta Diabetologica
Published
2020-01-27
Volume
57
Issue
6
Pages
697-703
ISSN
  • 0940-5429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-5233
OpenAlex
W3004118829
Cited by
60
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 4
FWCI
5.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Diabetologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, GDM risk prediction, large for gestational age, adverse pregnancy outcomes, early pregnancy biomarkers, singleton pregnancy
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Fasting, Female, Fetal Macrosomia, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Prenatal Diagnosis, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Prevalence, Diabetes, Gestational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review