Cited by 63Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

A pilot study of heart rate variability biofeedback therapy in the treatment of perinatal depression on a specialized perinatal psychiatry inpatient unit

Open access
Beckham, A. Jenna, Greene, Tammy B., Meltzer-Brody, Samantha·2013·Archives of Women's Mental Health

Abstract

Heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB) therapy may be useful in treating the prominent anxiety features of perinatal depression. We investigated the use of this non-pharmacologic therapy among women hospitalized with severe perinatal depression. Three questionnaires, the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale, and Linear Analog Self Assessment, were administered to 15 women in a specialized inpatient perinatal psychiatry unit. Participants were also contacted by telephone after discharge to assess continued use of HRVB techniques. The use of HRVB was associated with an improvement in all three scales. The greatest improvement (-13.867, p < 0.001 and -11.533, p < 0.001) was among STAI scores. A majority (81.9 %, n = 9) of women surveyed by telephone also reported continued frequent use at least once per week, and over half (54.6 %, n = 6) described the use of HRVB techniques as very or extremely beneficial. The use of HRVB was associated with statistically significant improvement on all instrument scores, the greatest of which was STAI scores, and most women reported frequent continued use of HRVB techniques after discharge. These results suggest that HRVB may be particularly beneficial in the treatment of the prominent anxiety features of perinatal depression, both in inpatient and outpatient settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00737-012-0318-7

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wearable data can provide important biological information about a patient's wellness and has potential for use in biofeedback interventions, which have been demonstrated to reduce mental health symptoms in the perinatal period.

    “Not only can this provide important biological information about a patient’s wellness, but it also has the potential for use in biofeedback interventions that have been demonstrated to be successful interventions to reduce mental health symptoms in the perinatal period [72–74].”

    From Technology-Based Approaches for Supporting Perinatal Mental Health (2022) · cites this paper as [73]

    The Methods describe an earlobe pulse sensor that provides real-time heart-rhythm feedback, and the Results report significantly reduced anxiety scores after biofeedback sessions. However, the device was a desktop system, not evidence about wearable data generally. The Conclusion calls the findings promising and says a controlled study is needed, so describing biofeedback as a demonstrated successful intervention overstates this pilot study. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beckham, A. J., Greene, T. B., & Meltzer-Brody, S.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Meltzer-Brody, Samantha
Venue
Archives of Women's Mental Health
Published
2012-11-25
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
59-65
ISSN
  • 1434-1816 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-1102
OpenAlex
W2113615429
Cited by
62
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Women s Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH085165)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
heart rate variability biofeedback, perinatal depression, anxiety, non-pharmacological treatment, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale, maternal mental health
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Biofeedback, Psychology, Depression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Rate, Humans, Inpatients, Mothers, Pilot Projects, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Socioeconomic Factors, Treatment Outcome, Depression, Postpartum, Peripartum Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review