Cited by 201Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumAttachment and Relationship DynamicsInfant Health and Development

Mother-child bonding at 1 year; associations with symptoms of postnatal depression and bonding in the first few weeks

O’Higgins, Madeleine, Roberts, Ian St James, Glover, Vivette, Taylor, Alyx·2013·Archives of Women's Mental Health

Abstract

Some mothers experience neutral or negative feelings toward their new infant. This study examined the association between symptoms of postnatal depression and mother-infant bonding and the persistence of these feelings over the first year. Bonding was assessed using the Mother-Infant Bonding Scale (MIBQ), at four times postnatal, "early weeks" (1-4 weeks), 9 weeks, 16 weeks and 1 year, in 50 depressed, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression scale (EPDS) ≥13 at 4 weeks post natal, and 29 non-depressed mothers. A significant association between the EPDS score at 4 weeks and bonding score at 1-4 weeks, 9 weeks, and at 1 year postnatal, χ(2)(1) = 9.85, p < 0.01, 5.44, p < 0.05 and 5.21, p < 0.05, respectively, was found, with a trend at 16 weeks. There was a strong association between bonding in the early weeks and all later time points χ(2)(1) = 17.26, p < 0.001, 7.89, p < 0.01 and 13.69, p < 0.001, respectively. Regression showed early bonding rather than early depression was the major predictor of bonding at 1 year. Women who are depressed postnatally can fail to bond well with their baby and this can persist for a year. Early identification and intervention for poor bonding is indicated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00737-013-0354-y

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O’Higgins, M., Roberts, I. S. J., Glover, V., & Taylor, A.
Affiliations
  • Toronto Western Hospital (CA)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Alyx
Venue
Archives of Women's Mental Health
Published
2013-04-21
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
381-389
ISSN
  • 1434-1816 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-1102
OpenAlex
W2128567314
Cited by
201
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6
FWCI
9.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Women s Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
postpartum depression, mother-infant bonding, infant bonding, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, early postpartum period, longitudinal follow-up
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Emotions, Female, Humans, Infant, Mother-Child Relations, Mothers, Object Attachment, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Socioeconomic Factors, Time Factors, Case-Control Studies, Depression, Postpartum, Postpartum Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review