Cited by 60Dental Implant Techniques and OutcomesDental materials and restorationsScientific and Engineering Research Topics

The atrophic edentulous alveolus. A preliminary study on a new generation of subperiosteal implants

Dimitroulis, George, Gupta, Benjamin, Wilson, Ian, Hart, Christopher·2022·Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Abstract

The aim of this cohort case series is to present a new subperiosteal implant device that uses CAD-CAM technologies together with 3D metal printing capabilities to produce direct bone-anchored dental prosthetic solutions for the management of atrophic edentulous alveolus and jaws. The clinical experience of 21 subperiosteal devices implanted over a 4-year period is presented. The results of this study showed 14 of the 21 cases were successful (66.7%), while 7 cases had complications including exposure of the metal frame (5 cases), mobility of the device (1 case) and 1 case failed for reasons unrelated to the device. Four of the 7 cases were successfully salvaged resulting in an overall success rate of 85.7% (18 /21 cases). This study supports the use of fully customized subperiosteal jaw implants as a simple and reliable alternative for dental rehabilitation of atrophic edentulous cases which would otherwise require bone grafts for conventional fixed dental implant solutions. With more research, the clinical potential for this device is significant as it not only avoids the need for complex and lengthy reconstructive jaw surgery but also allows for the placement of immediate prosthetic teeth at the time of implantation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10006-022-01044-3

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These features, along with cranial base anchorage, make the IPS Implants® Preprosthetic a unique dental rehabilitation device for stable restoration in complex cases, distinguishing it from other subperiosteal implants, particularly those produced by laser melting technology.

    “These features, along with cranial base anchorage, make the IPS Implants® Preprosthetic a unique dental rehabilitation device for stable restoration in complex cases, distinguishing it from other subperiosteal implants, particularly those produced by laser melting technology [25–32].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dimitroulis, G., Gupta, B., Wilson, I., & Hart, C.
Affiliations
Epworth Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Dimitroulis, George
Venue
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Published
2022-02-04
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
69-78
ISSN
  • 1432-9417 (ISSN-L)
  • 1865-1569
OpenAlex
W4210603252
Cited by
60
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3
FWCI
11.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Scientific and Engineering Research Topics
Keywords
subperiosteal implants, edentulous jaw, CAD/CAM, metal additive manufacturing, implant failure, implant salvage, dental rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous, Maxilla, Mouth, Edentulous, Dental Implants, Treatment Outcome, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review