CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 52Dental Implant Techniques and OutcomesDental materials and restorationsScientific and Engineering Research Topics

Patient- and clinician-reported outcomes for the additively manufactured sub-periosteal jaw implant (AMSJI) in the maxilla: a prospective multicentre one-year follow-up study

Van den Borre, C., Rinaldi, M., De Neef, B., Loomans, N.A.J., Nout, E., Van Doorne, L., Naert, I., Politis, C. +5 more·2022·International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
DOI 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.05.015
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The clinical outcomes of maxillary rehabilitation with the additively manufactured sub-periosteal jaw implant (AMSJI; CADskills BV) were evaluated in edentulous patients with a Cawood-Howell atrophy classification ≥5 in all regions of the maxilla. Fifteen consecutive patients were included in the study and followed up for 1 year. They were interviewed using a survey protocol and were examined clinically and radiographically preoperatively (T0) and at 1 (T1), 6 (T2), and 12 (T3) months after permanent upper prosthesis placement. The patients reported an increased oral health-related quality of life. The overall mean Oral Health Impact Profile-14 score at T0 was 17.20 (standard deviation (SD) 6.42). When results at T0 were compared to those at T1 (mean 8.93, SD 5.30), a statistically significant difference was seen (P = 0.001). At T3, the mean value was 5.80 (SD 4.18). Compared to T0, there was also a statistically significant difference at T3 (P = 0.001). General satisfaction based on the numerical rating scale was a mean 49.93 at T1, which was less than patient expectation prior to treatment at T0 (52.13). A higher overall value was seen at T3 (53.20) when compared to T0. Within the constraints of the short follow-up, the AMSJI appears to be a promising tool for patients with extreme jaw atrophy. The high patient expectations were met without complications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.05.015

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These features, along with cranial base anchorage, make the IPS Implants® Preprosthetic a unique dental rehabilitation device for stable restoration in complex cases, distinguishing it from other subperiosteal implants, particularly those produced by laser melting technology.

    “These features, along with cranial base anchorage, make the IPS Implants® Preprosthetic a unique dental rehabilitation device for stable restoration in complex cases, distinguishing it from other subperiosteal implants, particularly those produced by laser melting technology [25–32].”

    From Innovative landing zones for one-piece, rigidly fixated patient-specific subperiosteal implants in dental rehabilitation of severe maxillary and midfacial defects (2025) · cites this paper as [32]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Van den Borre, C., Rinaldi, M., De Neef, B., Loomans, N. A. J., Nout, E., Van Doorne, L., Naert, I., Politis, C., Schouten, H., Klomp, G., Beckers, L., Freilich, M. M., & Mommaerts, M. Y.
Affiliations
  • GZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus (BE)
  • Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis (NL)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • Rode Kruis Ziekenhuis (NL)
  • Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital (CA)
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
243-250
ISSN
0901-5027 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ijom.2021.05.015
OpenAlex
W3165372224
Cited by
52
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5
FWCI
6.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Scientific and Engineering Research Topics
Keywords
additive manufacturing, atrophic maxilla, edentulous maxilla, maxillary rehabilitation, oral health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, patient expectations
MeSH terms
Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous, Maxilla, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Dental Implants, Alveolar Bone Loss, Treatment Outcome, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review