The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effectiveness, earmarking and labeling: testing the acceptability of carbon taxes with survey data
Open accessAbstract
This paper analyzes the drivers of carbon taxes acceptability with survey data and a randomized labeling treatment. Based on a sample of more than 300individuals, it assesses the effect on acceptability of specific policy designs and individuals’ perceptions of carbon taxes advantages and disadvantages. We find that the lack of perception of primary and ancillary benefits is one of the main barriers to the acceptability of carbon taxes. In addition, policy design matters for acceptability and in particular earmarking fiscal revenues for environmental purposes can lead to larger support. We also find an effect of labeling, comparing the wording ‘‘climate contribution’’ with ‘‘carbon tax’’. We argue that proper policy design coupled with effective communication on the effects of carbon taxes may lead to a substantial improvement in acceptability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.4.341 · Cited by 6,544
Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda
Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004 · Cited by 5,089
(2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803475 · Cited by 2,987
Public acceptability of personal carbon trading and carbon tax
Bristow, A. L., Wardman, M., Zanni, A. M., & Chintakayala, P. K. (2010) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.021 · Cited by 230
Cited by
Making carbon pricing work for citizens
Klenert, D., Mattauch, L., Combet, E., Edenhofer, O., Hepburn, C., Rafaty, R., & Stern, N. (2018) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0201-2 · Cited by 793
Does carbon pricing reduce emissions? A review of ex-post analyses
Green, J. F. (2021) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abdae9 · Cited by 530
Perceived fairness and public acceptability of carbon pricing: a review of the literature
Maestre-Andrés, S., Drews, S., & van den Bergh, J. (2019) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2019.1639490 · Cited by 489
Overcoming public resistance to carbon taxes
Carattini, S., Carvalho, M., & Fankhauser, S. (2018) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.531 · Cited by 455
Self-citationYellow Vests, Pessimistic Beliefs, and Carbon Tax Aversion
Douenne, T., & Fabre, A. (2022) · American Economic Journal: Economic Policy · doi:10.1257/pol.20200092 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Baranzini, A., & Carattini, S.
- Venue
- Environmental Economics and Policy Studies
- Published
- 2016-02-24
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 197-227
- ISSN
- 1432-847X
- 1867-383X
- OpenAlex
- W2491715504
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 21.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effectiveness, earmarking and labeling: testing the acceptability of carbon taxes with survey data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10018-016-0144-7
- The paper
- Baranzini, A., & Carattini, S. (2017). Effectiveness, earmarking and labeling: testing the acceptability of carbon taxes with survey data. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-016-0144-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
