Cited by 129Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychological Testing and AssessmentHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

The brief assessment of cognition in schizophrenia. Normative data for the Italian population

Anselmetti, Simona, Poletti, Sara, Ermoli, Elena, Bechi, Margherita, Cappa, Stefano, Venneri, Annalena, Smeraldi, Enrico, Cavallaro, Roberto·2008·Neurological Sciences

Abstract

Objective To provide normative values for the Italian population for the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS), a recent brief neuropsychological instrument for the assessment of cognition in patients with schizophrenia.Participants Data were collected from 204 healthy adult Italian subjects, stratified by gender, education and age.Measurements and results Tests included in the BACS are the following: list learning, digit sequencing, verbal fluency, token motor task, symbol-coding and Tower of London. Normative values were established using the Equivalent Scores method in order to enable comparison with other neuropsychological tasks commonly used in the assessment of the Italian population. Performance on the BACS was influenced by the commonest demographic variables such as age and education.Conclusions The availability of normative data for the Italian population will increase the usefulness of this test for both clinical and experimental purposes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10072-008-0866-9

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anselmetti, S., Poletti, S., Ermoli, E., Bechi, M., Cappa, S., Venneri, A., Smeraldi, E., & Cavallaro, R.
Affiliations
  • Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT)
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
Corresponding author
Anselmetti, Simona
Venue
Neurological Sciences
Published
2008-04
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
85-92
ISSN
  • 1590-1874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1590-3478
OpenAlex
W2018090334
Cited by
129
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia, BACS, reference values, schizophrenia, cognitive assessment, neuropsychological assessment, Italian population, age and education effects, Tower of London, symbol coding, verbal fluency, list learning
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Disability Evaluation, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Intelligence Tests, Italy, Male, Memory, Mental Processes, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Reference Values, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Verbal Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review