Cited by 60Historical and Modern Theater StudiesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Multifocal Cognitive Dysfunction in High-Dose Benzodiazepine Users: A Cross-Sectional Study

Federico, Angela, Tamburin, Stefano, Maier, Alice, Faccini, Marco, Casari, Rebecca, Morbioli, Laura, Lugoboni, Fabio·2017·Neurological Sciences

Abstract

Benzodiazepines (BZDs) are the most widely prescribed drug class in developed countries, but they have high potential for tolerance, dependence and abuse. Cognitive deficits in long-term BZD users have long been known, but previous results might have been biased by patients' old age, coexisting neurological or psychiatric conditions or concurrent alcohol or psychotropic drug dependence. The study was aimed to explore the neuropsychological effect of high-dose BZD dependence, which represents an emerging addiction phenomenon. We recruited a group of high-dose BZD users with neither neurological or psychiatric comorbidity except anxiety or depression nor concurrent alcohol or psychotropic drug dependence. They underwent a battery of cognitive tests to explore verbal, visuospatial memory, working memory, attention, and executive functions. All the neuropsychological measures were significantly worse in patients than controls, and some of them were influenced by the BZD cumulative dose. The severity of depression and anxiety had a minimal influence on cognitive tests. Patients with high-dose BZD intake show profound changes in cognitive function. The impact of cognition should be considered in this population of patients, who may be involved in risky activities or have high work responsibilities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10072-016-2732-5

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Federico, A., Tamburin, S., Maier, A., Faccini, M., Casari, R., Morbioli, L., & Lugoboni, F.
Affiliations
University of Verona (IT)
Corresponding author
Tamburin, Stefano
Venue
Neurological Sciences
Published
2016-10-11
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
137-142
ISSN
  • 1590-1874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1590-3478
OpenAlex
W2531101424
Cited by
60
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 10
FWCI
10.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
benzodiazepines, benzodiazepine dependence, cognitive impairment, cumulative dose, memory, working memory, attention, executive function, neuropsychological outcomes, anxiety, depression
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Attention, Benzodiazepines, Cognition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Substance-Related Disorders, Executive Function, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review