Cited by 58Adrenal Hormones and DisordersStress Responses and CortisolCognitive Functions and Memory

Corticosteroids and cognition: a meta-analysis

Prado, Catherine E., Crowe, Simon F.·2019·Neuropsychology Review

Abstract

A thorough understanding of the cognitive effects of corticosteroids is essential given their frequency of use. This meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the effects of corticosteroids on the various domains of cognitive functioning, grouped by duration of use. An electronic search of PsycInfo, Medline and Google Scholar was conducted for all journal articles published between January 1990 and May 2018. Twenty six studies were included enabling calculation of standardised mean difference (SMD) using a random effects model for the cognitive domains of divided attention, executive function, expressive language, immediate memory, processing speed, recent memory, sustained attention, very long term memory and working memory. Results revealed that corticosteroids had a modest, negative effect on executive function for acute users, recent memory for short term and chronic users, and very long term memory for acute users. Corticosteroids had a small, significant, positive effect on expressive language for short term users.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11065-019-09405-8

Cites

120 of 120 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both endogenous and exogenous glucocorticoid excess acting on mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptors expressed by neurons in the central nervous system have been shown to directly alter the structure and functioning of the brain.

    “Both endogenous and exogenous glucocorticoid excess on MR and GR expressed by neurons in the CNS have been shown directly alter the structure and functioning of the brain (429–431).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prado, C. E., & Crowe, S. F.
Affiliations
La Trobe University (AU)
Corresponding author
Crowe, Simon F.
Venue
Neuropsychology Review
Published
2019-05-26
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
288-312
ISSN
  • 1040-7308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6660
OpenAlex
W2944889550
Cited by
58
References
120
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
corticosteroids, cognitive effects, executive function, memory, divided attention, sustained attention, processing speed, working memory, expressive language, glucocorticoids
MeSH terms
Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Attention, Cognition, Humans, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review