Cited by 59Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityNeutropenia and Cancer InfectionsFungal Infections and Studies

A prospective cohort study evaluating the prognostic impact of clinical characteristics and comorbid conditions of hospitalized adult and pediatric cancer patients with candidemia

Velasco, E., Bigni, R.·2008·European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical aspects of the epidemiology of candidemia and compare the prognostic impact of potential risk factors and the microbiology data of adults and children with cancer. A prospective cohort study enrolling 99 adults and 130 children with candidemia at a tertiary oncology care center in Brazil was undertaken. A total of 229 episodes were analyzed. The overall mortality was higher among adults than in children (37.4% vs. 7.7%, respectively). Univariate analysis revealed significant differences in the risk factors associated with death between both groups. Mortality was similar following fungemia with Candida albicans and all C. non-albicans species. However, significant differences in the interspecies distribution and death rates were observed, mainly among C. glabrata, krusei, and tropicalis species. Multivariate analysis showed comorbidities and neutropenia to be independently associated with mortality in adults, while in children, only comorbidities negatively affected the outcome. Comorbidities were the most important independent prognostic factor in both groups. The inclusion of detailed information about pre-existent illnesses might have a real benefit in studies of candidemia outcome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10096-008-0546-y

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A few studies have questioned these recommendations, failing to find a significant mortality benefit with prompt removal of the line and advising that removal and placement of a new device does not come without risk and cost.

    “A few studies have questioned these recommendations, failing to find a significant mortality benefit with prompt removal of the line and advising that removal and placement of a new device does not come without risk and cost.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Velasco, E., & Bigni, R.
Affiliations
Instituto Nacional de Câncer - INCA (BR)
Corresponding author
Velasco, E.
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Published
2008-06-12
Volume
27
Issue
11
Pages
1071-1078
ISSN
  • 0934-9723 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-4373
OpenAlex
W2072464950
Cited by
59
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
candidemia, fungemia, cancer patients, pediatric oncology, adult oncology, mortality, prognostic factors, comorbidities, neutropenia, Candida albicans, non-albicans Candida, Candida glabrata, Candida krusei, Candida tropicalis, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Brazil, Candida, Candidiasis, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Neutropenia, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Comorbidity, Fungemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review