Cited by 11Probiotics and Fermented FoodsInfant Nutrition and HealthAnimal Diversity and Health Studies

Safety, functional properties and technological performance in whey-based media of probiotic candidates from human breast milk

Open access
Zacarías, María Florencia, Binetti, Ana, Bockelmann, Wilhelm, Reinheimer, Jorge, Heller, Knut, Vinderola, Gabriel·2019·International Microbiology

Abstract

We aimed at isolating and characterising microorganisms present in human breast milk with probiotic potential. In an 8-week postpartum sampling period, two strains of bifidobacteria (Bifidobacterium longum LM7a and Bifidobacterium dentium LM8a') and four strains of lactobacilli were isolated, all during the first 4-week postpartum. B. longum LM7a and B. dentium LM8a', together with four strains previously isolated from breast milk (Bifidobacterium lactis INL1, INL2, INL4 and INL5), were considered for further studies. Susceptibility of the strains to tetracycline, erythromycin, clindamycin, streptomycin, vancomycin and chloramphenicol was evaluated and the isolates exhibited, in general, the same properties as previously reported for bifidobacteria. All isolates showed low hydrophobicity and B. lactis and B. longum strains had satisfactory resistance to gastric digestion and bile shock, but not to pancreatin. B. lactis INL1, B. longum LM7a and B. dentium LM8a' were selected for some comparative technological studies. In particular, B. lactis INL1 displayed technological potential, with satisfactory growth in cheese whey-based media in biofermentor and resistance to freeze-drying, accelerated storage conditions and simulated gastric digestion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10123-018-00046-0

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zacarías, M. F., Binetti, A., Bockelmann, W., Reinheimer, J., Heller, K., & Vinderola, G.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
  • Max Rubner Institut (DE)
Corresponding author
Zacarías, María Florencia
Venue
International Microbiology
Published
2018-11-19
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
265-277
ISSN
  • 1139-6709 (ISSN-L)
  • 1618-1905
OpenAlex
W2900537886
Cited by
10
References
74
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • International Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion)
Funders
DAAD
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Animal Diversity and Health Studies
Keywords
probiotics, breast milk, Bifidobacterium, Bifidobacterium longum, Bifidobacterium dentium, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, lactobacilli, antibiotic susceptibility, hydrophobicity, bile resistance, freeze-drying stability, whey, postpartum milk
MeSH terms
Whey, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bifidobacterium, Bile Acids and Salts, Culture Media, Female, Gastric Acid, Humans, Lactobacillus, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Milk, Human, Pancreatin, Probiotics, Microbial Viability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review