The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Dietary Inulin Supplementation on Inflammation of Pouch Mucosa in Patients With an Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis
Abstract
PURPOSE: Inflammation is a constant finding in the ileal reservoir of patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and is associated with decreased fecal concentrations of the short chain fatty acid butyrate, increased fecal pH, changes in fecal flora, and increased concentrations of secondary bile acids. In healthy subjects, inulin, a dietary fiber, is fermented to short chain fatty acids and leads to a lower pH and potentially beneficial changes in fecal flora. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of enteral supplementation of inulin on inflammation of the ileal reservoir. METHODS: Twenty patients received 24 g of inulin or placebo daily during three weeks in a randomized, double-blind, crossover design. Stools were analyzed after each test period for pH, short chain fatty acids, microflora, and bile acids. Inflammation was assessed endoscopically, histologically, and clinically. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, three weeks of dietary supplementation with 24 g of inulin increased butyrate concentrations, lowered pH, decreased numbers of Bacteroides fragilis, and diminished concentrations of secondary bile acids in feces. This was endoscopically and histologically accompanied by a reduction of inflammation of the mucosa of the ileal reservoir. CONCLUSION: Enteral inulin supplementation leads to a decrease of inflammation-associated factors and to a reduction of inflammation of pouch mucosa.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breuer, N. F., Rampton, D. S., Tammar, A., Murphy, G. M., & Dowling, R. H. (1983) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/0016-5085(83)90199-3 · Cited by 61
Cited by
Review article: the role of butyrate on colonic function
HAMER, H. M., JONKERS, D., VENEMA, K., VANHOUTVIN, S., TROOST, F. J., & BRUMMER, R. ‐. (2008) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03562.x · Cited by 2,721
Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on human health
Markowiak, P., & Śliżewska, K. (2017) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu9091021 · Cited by 2,401
Interactions of gut microbiota with functional food components and nutraceuticals
Laparra, J. M., & Sanz, Y. (2010) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2009.11.001 · Cited by 684
ESPEN guideline: Clinical nutrition in inflammatory bowel disease
Forbes, A., Escher, J., Hébuterne, X., Kłęk, S., Krznaric, Z., Schneider, S., Shamir, R., Stardelova, K., Wierdsma, N., Wiskin, A. E., et al. (2017) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2016.12.027 · Cited by 625
RetractedAl-Lahham, S. H., Peppelenbosch, M. P., Roelofsen, H., Vonk, R. J., & Venema, K. (2010) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids · doi:10.1016/j.bbalip.2010.07.007 · Cited by 614
Metadata
- Authors
- Welters, C. F. M., Heineman, E., Thunnissen, F. B. J. M., van den Bogaard, A. E. J. M., Soeters, P. B., & Baeten, C. G. M. I.
- Venue
- Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 621-627
- ISSN
- 0012-3706 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037111559
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Dietary Inulin Supplementation on Inflammation of Pouch Mucosa in Patients With an Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10350-004-6257-2
- The paper
- Welters, C. F. M., Heineman, E., Thunnissen, F. B. J. M., van den Bogaard, A. E. J. M., Soeters, P. B., & Baeten, C. G. M. I. (2002). Effect of Dietary Inulin Supplementation on Inflammation of Pouch Mucosa in Patients With an Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6257-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.