CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 302Digital Platforms and EconomicsDiverse Legal and Medical StudiesMerger and Competition Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 97 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Google, Facebook, Amazon, eBay: Is the Internet driving competition or market monopolization?

Haucap, Justus, Heimeshoff, Ulrich·2014·International Economics and Economic Policy
DOI 10.1007/s10368-013-0247-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10368-013-0247-6

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Von Blanckenburg K, Michaelis M (2008a) dDay – eBay: Funktionsdefekte auf dem Markt für Online-Auktionshäuser. Wettbewerb in Recht und Praxis 4(2008):463–470

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 302

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Haucap, J., & Heimeshoff, U.
Affiliations
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Haucap, Justus
  • Heimeshoff, Ulrich
ORCID
Venue
International Economics and Economic Policy
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2013-08-21
Volume
11
Issue
1-2
Pages
49-61
ISSN
  • 1612-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1612-4812
DOI
10.1007/s10368-013-0247-6
OpenAlex
W2017085528
Cited by
302
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 11
FWCI
83.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • International Economics and Economic Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
Keywords
digital markets, market concentration, market power, competition policy, search engines, online auction platforms, social networks, digital platforms, competition law, market regulation, monopolization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review