PreprintCited by 87Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Automating Mendelian randomization through machine learning to construct a putative causal map of the human phenome

Open access
Hemani, Gibran, Bowden, Jack, Haycock, Philip, Zheng, Jie, Davis, Oliver, Flach, Peter, Gaunt, Tom, Smith, George Davey·2017·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Abstract

A major application for genome-wide association studies (GWAS) has been the emerging field of causal inference using Mendelian randomization (MR), where the causal effect between a pair of traits can be estimated using only summary level data. MR depends on SNPs exhibiting vertical pleiotropy, where the SNP influences an outcome phenotype only through an exposure phenotype. Issues arise when this assumption is violated due to SNPs exhibiting horizontal pleiotropy. We demonstrate that across a range of pleiotropy models, instrument selection will be increasingly liable to selecting invalid instruments as GWAS sample sizes continue to grow. Methods have been developed in an attempt to protect MR from different patterns of horizontal pleiotropy, and here we have designed a mixture-of-experts machine learning framework (MR-MoE 1.0) that predicts the most appropriate model to use for any specific causal analysis, improving on both power and false discovery rates. Using the approach, we systematically estimated the causal effects amongst 2407 phenotypes. Almost 90% of causal estimates indicated some level of horizontal pleiotropy. The causal estimates are organised into a publicly available graph database ( http://eve.mrbase.org ), and we use it here to highlight the numerous challenges that remain in automated causal inference.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/173682

Cites

55 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Canalization can occur when polymorphic phenotypes expressed during fetal development lead to the development of compensating pathways to mitigate the effects of that expression.

    “Canalization can occur when polymorphic phenotypes expressed during fetal development lead to the development of compensating pathways to mitigate the effects of that expression. 1,178,179”

    From Mendelian randomization (2022) · cites this paper as [179]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Hemani G, Tilling K, Davey Smith G. Orienting The Causal Relationship Between Imprecisely Measured Traits Using Genetic Instruments. bioRxiv [Internet]. 2017; Available from: http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/03/15/117101
  2. Verbanck M, Chen C-Y, Neale B, Do R. Widespread pleiotropy confounds causal relationships between complex traits and diseases inferred from Mendelian randomization. bioRxiv [Internet]. 2017; Available from: http://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/06/30/157552
  3. Wright S. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. In: Evolution and the genetics of populations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1968.
  4. Hodgkin J. Seven types of pleiotropy. The International journal of developmental biology [Internet]. 1998;42(3):501-5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9654038
  5. Sun BB, Maranville JC, Peters JE, Stacey D, Staley JR, Blackshaw J, et al. Consequences Of Natural Perturbations In The Human Plasma Proteome. bioRxiv [Internet]. 2017; Available from: http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/05/05/134551
  6. Richardson TG, Zheng J, Davey Smith G, Timpson NJ, Gaunt TR, Relton CL, et al. Causal epigenome-wide association study identifies CpG sites that influence cardiovascular disease risk. bioRxiv [Internet]. 2017; Available from: http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/04/29/132019
  7. Vanderweele TJ, Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ, Cornelis M, Kraft P. Methodological challenges in mendelian randomization. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass) [Internet]. 2014 May;25(3):427-35. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24681576
  8. Liaw A, Wiener M. Classification and Regression by randomForest. R News [Internet]. 2002;2(3):18-22. Available from: http://cran.r-project.org/doc/Rnews/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hemani, G., Bowden, J., Haycock, P., Zheng, J., Davis, O., Flach, P., Gaunt, T., & Smith, G. D.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2017-08-10
OpenAlex
W2744463954
Cited by
85
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK (C18281/, C18281 / A19169, A20138, A19169, C52724/A20138)
  • Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12013, MC UU 12013/8, MCUU12013/1, MR/N501906/1)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/K031910/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
Mendelian randomization, horizontal pleiotropy, instrument selection, mixture of experts, causal effect estimation, false discovery rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review