Cited by 1,108Machine Learning and AlgorithmsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningMachine Learning and Data Classification

A perspective view and survey of meta-learning

Vilalta, Ricardo, Drissi, Youssef·2002·Artificial Intelligence Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1019956318069

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vilalta, R., & Drissi, Y.
Affiliations
IBM (United States) (US)
Venue
Artificial Intelligence Review
Published
2002-06
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
77-95
ISSN
  • 0269-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7462
OpenAlex
W2145680191
Cited by
1,108
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 110 · 2023: 113 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 121 · 2020: 107 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 20
FWCI
8.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Artificial Intelligence Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
Keywords
meta-learning, meta-knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review