Cited by 178Speech and dialogue systemsReinforcement Learning in RoboticsNatural Language Processing Techniques

Survey on reinforcement learning for language processing

Open access
Uc-Cetina, Víctor, Navarro-Guerrero, Nicolás, Martin-Gonzalez, Anabel, Weber, Cornelius, Wermter, Stefan·2023·Artificial Intelligence Review

Abstract

In recent years some researchers have explored the use of reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms as key components in the solution of various natural language processing (NLP) tasks. For instance, some of these algorithms leveraging deep neural learning have found their way into conversational systems. This paper reviews the state of the art of RL methods for their possible use for different problems of NLP, focusing primarily on conversational systems, mainly due to their growing relevance. We provide detailed descriptions of the problems as well as discussions of why RL is well-suited to solve them. Also, we analyze the advantages and limitations of these methods. Finally, we elaborate on promising research directions in NLP that might benefit from RL.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10462-022-10205-5

Cites

150 of 150 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Verification models perform relatively well if given correct evidence.

    “For the verification subtask, verification models perform relatively well if given correct evidence [137].”

    From Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation (2023) · cites this paper as [137]

    The passages in §3 (Language understanding) and §6 (Conversational systems and other language processing tasks) discuss intent interpretation, information retrieval, and system performance, but not a verification subtask or how verification models perform when given correct evidence. Searches for “correct evidence,” “verification subtask,” and fact verification found no passage addressing that claim in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 151 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Bahdanau D, Cho K, Bengio Y (2015) Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and trans- late. In: International conference on learning representations (ICLR), San Diego, CA, USA. arxiv
  2. Cangelosi A, Parisi D (eds) (2002) Simulating the evolution of language. Springer, London
  3. Chomsky N (1959) On certain formal properties of grammars. Inf Control 2(2):137-167. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ S0019-9958(59) 90362-6 · DOI
  4. Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, Xu B, Warde-Farley D, Ozair S, Courville A, Bengio Y (2014) Generative adversarial nets. In: Advances in neural information processing systems (NIPS), Mon- treal, QC, Canada, vol 27. Curran Associates, Inc., pp 2672-2680
  5. Guo X, Klinger T, Rosenbaum C, Bigus JP, Campbell M, Kawas B, Talamadupula K, Tesauro G, Singh S (2017) Learning to query, reason, and answer questions on ambiguous texts. In: International conference on learning representations (ICLR), Toulon, France
  6. He J, Ostendorf M, He X (2017) Reinforcement learning with external knowledge and two-stage Q-func- tions for predicting popular Reddit threads. arXiv: 1704. 06217
  7. Henderson J, Lemon O, Georgila K (2008) Hybrid reinforcement/supervised learning of dialogue poli- cies from fixed datasets. Comput Linguist 34(4):487-511
  8. Jiang J, Teichert A, Eisner J, Daumé III H (2012) Learned prioritization for trading off accuracy and speed. In: Advances in neural information processing systems (NIPS), Lake Tahoe, NV, USA, vol 25
  9. Kiros R, Zhu Y, Salakhutdinov RR, Zemel R, Urtasun R, Torralba A, Fidler S (2015) Skip-thought vectors. In: Advances in neural information processing systems (NIPS), Montreal, QC, Canada, vol 28. Cur- ran Associates, Inc., pp 3294-3302
  10. Sutton RS, Barto AG (2018) Reinforcement learning: an introduction, 2nd edn. Adaptive computation and machine learning series. The MIT Press, Cambridge
  11. Weaver W (1955) Translation. In: Locke WN, Booth AD (eds) Machine translation of languages: fourteen essays. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 15-23

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uc-Cetina, V., Navarro-Guerrero, N., Martin-Gonzalez, A., Weber, C., & Wermter, S.
Affiliations
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence (DE)
Corresponding author
Uc-Cetina, Víctor
Venue
Artificial Intelligence Review
Published
2022-06-03
Volume
56
Issue
2
Pages
1543-1575
ISSN
  • 0269-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7462
OpenAlex
W3156829097
Cited by
177
References
151
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3
FWCI
11.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Artificial Intelligence Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (TRR-169)
  • CONACYT
  • Universität Hamburg
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
reinforcement learning, natural language processing, dialogue systems, deep reinforcement learning, NLP tasks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review