CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 609Health Policy Implementation SciencePsychiatric care and mental health servicesHealthcare Quality and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessing the Organizational Social Context (OSC) of Mental Health Services: Implications for Research and Practice

Glisson, Charles, Landsverk, John, Schoenwald, Sonja, Kelleher, Kelly, Hoagwood, Kimberly Eaton, Mayberg, Stephen, Green, Philip, The Research Network on Youth Mental Health·2008·Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
DOI 10.1007/s10488-007-0148-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The organizational social context in which mental health services are provided is believed to affect the adoption and implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) as well as the quality and outcomes of the services. A fully developed science of implementation effectiveness requires conceptual models that include organizational social context and tools for assessing social context that have been tested in a broad cross-section of mental health systems. This paper describes the role of organizational social context in services and implementation research and evaluates a comprehensive contextual measure, labeled Organizational Social Context (OSC), designed to assess the key latent constructs of culture, climate and work attitudes. The psychometric properties of the OSC measure were assessed in a nationwide study of 1,154 clinicians in 100 mental health clinics with a second-order confirmatory factor analysis of clinician responses, estimates of scale reliabilities, and indices of within-clinic agreement and between-clinic differences among clinicians. Finally, the paper illustrates the use of nationwide norms in describing the OSC profiles of individual mental health clinics and examines the cross-level association of organizational-level culture and climate with clinician-level work attitudes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10488-007-0148-5

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bliese, P. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multi-level theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349–381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  2. James, L. R., & Williams, L. J. (2000). The cross-level operator in regression, ANCOVA, contextual analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multi-level theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 382–424). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  3. Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Eds.). (2000b). Multi-level theory, research, and methods in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  4. Reichers, A. E., & Schneider, B. (1990). Climate and culture: An evolution of constructs. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 5–39). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  5. Rousseau, D. M. (1990). Assessing organizational culture: The case for multiple methods. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 153–192). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 609

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Glisson, C., Landsverk, J., Schoenwald, S., Kelleher, K., Hoagwood, K. E., Mayberg, S., Green, P., & The Research Network on Youth Mental Health
Affiliations
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Corresponding author
Glisson, Charles
ORCID
Venue
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2007-12-18
Volume
35
Issue
1-2
Pages
98-113
ISSN
  • 0894-587X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3289
DOI
10.1007/s10488-007-0148-5
OpenAlex
W2148178151
Cited by
608
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 41
FWCI
36.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Quality and Management
Keywords
mental health services, implementation effectiveness, evidence-based practice, organizational culture, organizational climate, psychometric properties, second-order confirmatory factor analysis, psychiatric clinic
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Diffusion of Innovation, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Organizational Culture, Evidence-Based Medicine, Health Care Surveys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review