Cited by 17Health Policy Implementation ScienceComputational and Text Analysis MethodsText and Document Classification Technologies

Automatic classification of communication logs into implementation stages via text analysis

Open access
Wang, Dingding, Ogihara, Mitsunori, Gallo, Carlos, Villamar, Juan A., Smith, Justin D., Vermeer, Wouter, Cruden, Gracelyn, Benbow, Nanette +1 more·2015·Implementation Science

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To improve the quality, quantity, and speed of implementation, careful monitoring of the implementation process is required. However, some health organizations have such limited capacity to collect, organize, and synthesize information relevant to its decision to implement an evidence-based program, the preparation steps necessary for successful program adoption, the fidelity of program delivery, and the sustainment of this program over time. When a large health system implements an evidence-based program across multiple sites, a trained intermediary or broker may provide such monitoring and feedback, but this task is labor intensive and not easily scaled up for large numbers of sites. We present a novel approach to producing an automated system of monitoring implementation stage entrances and exits based on a computational analysis of communication log notes generated by implementation brokers. Potentially discriminating keywords are identified using the definitions of the stages and experts' coding of a portion of the log notes. A machine learning algorithm produces a decision rule to classify remaining, unclassified log notes. RESULTS: We applied this procedure to log notes in the implementation trial of multidimensional treatment foster care in the California 40-county implementation trial (CAL-40) project, using the stages of implementation completion (SIC) measure. We found that a semi-supervised non-negative matrix factorization method accurately identified most stage transitions. Another computational model was built for determining the start and the end of each stage. CONCLUSIONS: This automated system demonstrated feasibility in this proof of concept challenge. We provide suggestions on how such a system can be used to improve the speed, quality, quantity, and sustainment of implementation. The innovative methods presented here are not intended to replace the expertise and judgement of an expert rater already in place. Rather, these can be used when human monitoring and feedback is too expensive to use or maintain. These methods rely on digitized text that already exists or can be collected with minimal to no intrusiveness and can signal when additional attention or remediation is required during implementation. Thus, resources can be allocated according to need rather than universally applied, or worse, not applied at all due to their cost.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13012-016-0483-6

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Broad systems for measuring implementation process through key milestones, quality, and quantity, such as the Stages of Implementation Completion or similar unobtrusive measures, can likely be used to measure implementation fidelity and progress in diverse conditions.

    “Nevertheless, it is likely that broad systems for measuring implementation process through key milestones, quality, and quantity, such as those identified in the Stages of Implementation Completion [86–88], or similar unobtrusive measures [89] can be used to measure implementation fidelity and progress in diverse conditions.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [9]Chamberlain P Brown CH Saldana L Reid J Wang W Marsenich L Sosna T Padgett C Bouwman G Engaging and recruiting counties in an experiment on implementing evidence-based practice in california Adm Policy Mental Health Mental Health Serv Res 2008 35 4 250 60 10.1007/s10488-008-0167-x PMC2562896 18302015 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [17]Gallo C Pantin H Villamar J Prado G Tapia M Ogihara M Cruden G Brown CH Blending qualitative and computational linguistics methods for fidelity assessment: experience with the familias unidas preventive intervention Adm Policy Mental Health 2015 42 5 574 85 10.1007/s10488-014-0538-4 PMC4125546 24500022 · DOI
  3. [32]Saldana L Chamberlain P Wang W Brown CH Predicting program start-up using the stages of implementation measure Admin Policy Mental Health Mental Health Serv Res 2012 39 6 419 25 10.1007/s10488-011-0363-y PMC3212640 21710257 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [40]Wang W Saldana L Chamberlain P Brown C To proceed or not to proceed: predicting implementation success 4th Annual NIH Conference on the Science of Dissemination and Implementation 2011 Washington, DC National Institutes of Health and Academy Health
  5. [42]Winkler WE Data cleaning methods Proceedings ACM SIGKDD workshop on data cleaning, record linkage, and object consolidation 2003 Washington, D.C. American Computing Machinery

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, D., Ogihara, M., Gallo, C., Villamar, J. A., Smith, J. D., Vermeer, W., Cruden, G., Benbow, N., & Brown, C. H.
Affiliations
  • Florida Atlantic University (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Brown, C. Hendricks
Venue
Implementation Science
Published
2015-12
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
119-119
ISSN
1748-5908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2512901908
Cited by
17
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Implementation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA027828)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text and Document Classification Technologies
Keywords
implementation monitoring, communication logs, text analysis, Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care, non-negative matrix factorization, decision rules, automated monitoring, implementation fidelity
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, California, Communication, Computer Simulation, Diffusion of Innovation, Feasibility Studies, Foster Home Care, Humans, Mathematics, Medical Informatics, Records, Sensitivity and Specificity, Information Storage and Retrieval, Translational Research, Biomedical, Data Mining

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review