Cited by 111Sexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyGambling Behavior and Treatments

The relationship between hypersexual behavior, sexual excitation, sexual inhibition, and personality traits

Rettenberger, Martin, Klein, Verena, Briken, Peer·2016·Archives of Sexual Behavior

Abstract

The term hypersexuality was introduced to describe excessive sexual behavior associated with a person's inability to control his or her sexual behavior. The main aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of different personality traits on the degree of hypersexual behavior as measured by the Hypersexual Behavior Inventory (HBI). A further aim was to evaluate the association between sexual inhibition and excitation [as described in the Dual Control Model (DCM)] and hypersexual behavior. A sample of 1,749 participants completed an internet-based survey comprised the HBI, the short form of the Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales (SIS/SES-SF) as well as more general personality measures: the Behavioral Inhibition System/Behavioral Activation System-scales (BIS/BAS-scales) and a short version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI-10). Using the recommended HBI cut-off, 6.0 % (n = 105) of the present sample could be categorized as hypersexual, which is comparable to the results of previous studies about the prevalence of hypersexual behavior in the general population. The results provided strong support for the components of the DCM-sexual excitation and inhibition-to explain hypersexual behavior, irrespective of gender and sexual orientation. Some of the general personality traits also showed significant relationships with hypersexual behavior. Taken together, the results of the present study provide further support for the relevance of research about the relationships between sexual problems and disorders, the DCM, and personality variables.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10508-014-0399-7

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rettenberger, M., Klein, V., & Briken, P.
Affiliations
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
Corresponding author
Rettenberger, Martin
Venue
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Published
2015-01-06
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
219-233
ISSN
  • 0004-0002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2800
OpenAlex
W1988271974
Cited by
111
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4
FWCI
15.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Keywords
hypersexuality, sexual excitation, sexual inhibition, dual control model, personality traits, behavioral inhibition system, behavioral activation system, Big Five personality traits
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Paraphilic Disorders, Personality, Personality Inventory, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review