Cited by 128Sexuality, Behavior, and TechnologySexual function and dysfunction studiesSex work and related issues

Self-Reported Indicators of Hypersexuality and Its Correlates in a Female Online Sample

Klein, Verena, Rettenberger, Martin, Briken, Peer·2014·The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract

Introduction: Hypersexual behavior has been a controversial and much disputed issue in the field of sexual medicine. However, only little attention has been paid to hypersexual behavior in women. Therefore, to date there is limited knowledge on the behavioral patterns of hypersexuality in women. Aims: The purpose of the present study was to examine which sexual behavioral patterns are associated with self-reported indicators of hypersexuality in a female online sample. The second aim was to evaluate the association between hypersexuality and sexual risk behavior in women. Methods: In total, 988 women participated in an online survey. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine the association between sexual behavioral patterns and hypersexuality. Furthermore, correlation analyses were calculated in order to identify the relationship between sexual risk behavior and hypersexuality. Main Outcome Measures: Indicators of hypersexual behavior were measured by the Hypersexual Behavior Inventory (HBI). In addition, current and present impersonal sexual activities were investigated. Sexual risk behavior was assessed using the Sexual Sensation Seeking Scale (SSSS). Results: High masturbation frequency, number of sexual partners, and pornography use were associated with a higher degree of hypersexual behavior in women. Furthermore, the HBI total score was positively correlated to sexual risk behavior. Conclusion: The results of the current study do not support the idea of previous research that hypersexual women are typically engaged in more passive forms of sexual behavior. Rather female hypersexuality seems to be more characterized by impersonal sexual activity. An association between hypersexual behavior and sexual risk behavior was identified. The implications of these findings for potential prevention strategies and therapeutic interventions are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jsm.12602

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klein, V., Rettenberger, M., & Briken, P.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Corresponding author
Klein, Verena
Venue
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Published
2014-08-01
Volume
11
Issue
8
Pages
1974-1981
ISSN
  • 1743-6095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-6109
OpenAlex
W1947924197
Cited by
128
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2
FWCI
11.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Sexual Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sex work and related issues
Keywords
hypersexuality, sexual risk behavior, sexual sensation seeking, masturbation frequency, number of sexual partners, pornography use, female sexual behavior
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Erotica, Female, Humans, Masturbation, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Regression Analysis, Sexual Partners, Sexuality, Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological, Unsafe Sex, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review