Cited by 392Cognitive Abilities and TestingIntergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Genetic and Environmental Influences on Vocabulary IQ: Parental Education Level as Moderator

Rowe, David C, Jacobson, Kristen C, Van den Oord, Edwin J C G·1999·Child Development

Abstract

This article examines how parental education level moderates the genetic and environmental contributions to variation in verbal IQ. Data are from 1909 non-Hispanic Whites and African American sibling pairs from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, which obtained nationally-based samples of identical (MZ) twins, fraternal (DZ) twins, full and half siblings, cousins (in the same household), and biologically unrelated siblings. In the whole sample, the variance estimate for heritability (h2 = .57, SE = .08) was greater than that for shared environment (c2 = .13, SE = .04). Both heritability and the shared environmental estimate were moderated, however, by level of parental education. Specifically, among more highly educated families, the average h2 = .74 (SE = .10) and the average c2 = .00 (SE = .05). Conversely, among less well-educated families, heritability decreased and shared environmental influences increased, yielding similar proportions of variance explained by genetic and environmental factors, average h2 = .26 (SE = .15), and average c2 = .23 (SE = .07).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-8624.00084

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rowe, Jacobson, and Van den Oord (1999) reported higher heritability of vocabulary IQ at higher levels of parental education among a population-based American sample of adolescent twin and sibling pairs.

    “Rowe, Jacobson, and Van den Oord (1999) reported higher heritability of vocabulary IQ at higher levels of parental education among a population-based American sample of adolescent twin and sibling pairs.”

    From Large Cross-National Differences in Gene × Socioeconomic Status Interaction on Intelligence (2016) · cites this paper as Rowe, Jacobson, and Van den Oord (1999)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rowe, D. C., Jacobson, K. C., & Van den Oord, E. J. C. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Utrecht University , Utrecht ,
Venue
Child Development
Published
1999-09-01
Volume
70
Issue
5
Pages
1151-1162
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W1965048700
Cited by
392
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 21
FWCI
17.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01- HD31921, P01HD031921)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
verbal IQ, heritability, shared environment, parental education, moderation, genetic factors, environmental influences, twins, siblings, African American adolescents, non-Hispanic White adolescents, Add Health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Rearing, Child, Preschool, Educational Status, Family, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Genetics, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Environment, Teaching, Twins, Vocabulary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review