Cited by 1293D Printing in Biomedical ResearchMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

Micro-ring structures stabilize microdroplets to enable long term spheroid culture in 384 hanging drop array plates

Open access
Hsiao, Amy Y., Tung, Yi-Chung, Kuo, Chuan-Hsien, Mosadegh, Bobak, Bedenis, Rachel, Pienta, Kenneth J., Takayama, Shuichi·2012·Biomedical Microdevices

Abstract

Using stereolithography, 20 different structural variations comprised of millimeter diameter holes surrounded by trenches, plateaus, or micro-ring structures were prepared and tested for their ability to stably hold arrays of microliter sized droplets within the structures over an extended period of time. The micro-ring structures were the most effective in stabilizing droplets against mechanical and chemical perturbations. After confirming the importance of micro-ring structures using rapid prototyping, we developed an injection molding tool for mass production of polystyrene 3D cell culture plates with an array of 384 such micro-ring surrounded through-hole structures. These newly designed and injection molded polystyrene 384 hanging drop array plates with micro-rings were stable and robust against mechanical perturbations as well as surface fouling-facilitated droplet spreading making them capable of long term cell spheroid culture of up to 22 days within the droplet array. This is a significant improvement over previously reported 384 hanging drop array plates which are susceptible to small mechanical shocks and could not reliably maintain hanging drops for longer than a few days. With enhanced droplet stability, the hanging drop array plates with micro-ring structures provide better platforms and open up new opportunities for high-throughput preparation of microscale 3D cell constructs for drug screening and cell analysis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10544-011-9608-5

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hsiao et al. used these plates as a high throughput method for testing anticancer drug sensitivities on H9 human epithelial carcinoma cells.

    “They continued on to use these plates as a high throughput method for testing anticancer drug sensitivities on H9 human epithelial carcinoma cells.”

    From Modeling physiological events in 2D vs. 3D cell culture (2017) · cites this paper as [55]

    The Materials and Methods section (Hanging Drop Formation and Spheroid Culture; page unavailable) confirms that Hsiao et al. used 384 hanging-drop plates to culture cancer-containing spheroids. It describes PC-3Luc GFP prostate cancer cells in a co-culture, not H9 cells, and the experiment assessed long-term culture rather than anticancer drug sensitivity. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Hsiao et al. designed a plate using micro-ring structures to stabilize drops, allowing 14-day culture of prostate cancer cells.

    “To overcome this, one group, Hsiao et al. (55), designed a plate using micro-ring structures to stabilize the drops, allowing for 14day culture of prostate cancer cells.”

    From Modeling physiological events in 2D vs. 3D cell culture (2017) · cites this paper as [55]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kobayashi K Ikuta K IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics 1–3 661 666 2007

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hsiao, A. Y., Tung, Y.-C., Kuo, C.-H., Mosadegh, B., Bedenis, R., Pienta, K. J., & Takayama, S.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Takayama, Shuichi
Venue
Biomedical Microdevices
Published
2011-11-05
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
313-323
ISSN
  • 1387-2176 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8781
OpenAlex
W2110419119
Cited by
129
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biomedical Microdevices (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Scholarworks@UNIST (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P50CA069568)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Keywords
3D cell culture, spheroid culture, stereolithography, injection molding, droplet spreading, surface fouling, drug screening
MeSH terms
Equipment Design, Humans, Spheroids, Cellular, Cell Culture Techniques, Cell Line, Tumor, High-Throughput Screening Assays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review