Cited by 9693D Printing in Biomedical ResearchCancer Cells and Metastasis3D IC and TSV technologies

High-throughput 3D spheroid culture and drug testing using a 384 hanging drop array

Open access
Tung, Yi-Chung, Hsiao, Amy Y., Allen, Steven G., Torisawa, Yu-suke, Ho, Mitchell, Takayama, Shuichi·2011·The Analyst

Abstract

Culture of cells as three-dimensional (3D) aggregates can enhance in vitro tests for basic biological research as well as for therapeutics development. Such 3D culture models, however, are often more complicated, cumbersome, and expensive than two-dimensional (2D) cultures. This paper describes a 384-well format hanging drop culture plate that makes spheroid formation, culture, and subsequent drug testing on the obtained 3D cellular constructs as straightforward to perform and adapt to existing high-throughput screening (HTS) instruments as conventional 2D cultures. Using this platform, we show that drugs with different modes of action produce distinct responses in the physiological 3D cell spheroids compared to conventional 2D cell monolayers. Specifically, the anticancer drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has higher anti-proliferative effects on 2D cultures whereas the hypoxia activated drug commonly referred to as tirapazamine (TPZ) are more effective against 3D cultures. The multiplexed 3D hanging drop culture and testing plate provides an efficient way to obtain biological insights that are often lost in 2D platforms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c0an00609b

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PDMS wells with triangular pyramid shape opening promoted growth of spheroids, with some control over size achievable.

    “PDMS wells with a triangular pyramid shape opening promoted the growth of spheroids, with some control over the size achievable.”

    From Modeling physiological events in 2D vs. 3D cell culture (2017) · cites this paper as [110]

    The Experimental section (‘Plate design, fabrication, and hanging drop formation’; page unavailable) says the plate is made of polystyrene, not PDMS, and describes circular access holes and plateaus by diameter, not triangular-pyramid openings. The Results section (‘Formation of hanging drops for spheroid culture’; page unavailable) does support spheroid formation, while the Introduction says the platform forms uniformly sized spheroids. The claimed well material and opening shape are contrary to the paper’s design description. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In A431.H9 3D cultures, the lack of proliferating cells resulted in a 100-fold increase in resistance to 5-FU by culture method.

    “Tung et al . 64 showed that the lack proliferating cells in A431.H9 3D cultures resulted in 100-fold increase in resistance to 5-FU by culture method.”

    From Three-dimensional cell culture systems and their applications in drug discovery and cell-based biosensors (2014) · cites this paper as [64]

    The Results and discussion section, under “Anticancer drug sensitivity testing” (page not provided), reports greater 5-FU resistance in A431.H9 spheroids than in 2D cultures. Its IC50 values imply a range of roughly 10- to 1,000-fold, not a single 100-fold increase. It attributes resistance partly to quiescent cells and limited drug penetration, rather than a complete lack of proliferating cells; the same section describes proliferating cells at the spheroid periphery. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Torisawa et al. created a chip system utilizing microfluidics that allows spheroids to grow in a controlled environment for long-term culture.

    “Torisawa et al. (110) created a novel chip system utilizing microfluidics that allows spheroids to grow in a controlled environment for long-term culture.”

    From Modeling physiological events in 2D vs. 3D cell culture (2017) · cites this paper as [110]

    The Introduction and the Results and discussion section on long-term culture support that the authors developed a platform for stable, long-term spheroid culture. But the Experimental section describes their system as an injection-molded 384 hanging-drop plate, not a microfluidic chip; the Introduction discusses microfluidic devices as other approaches. Torisawa is a coauthor, although Tung is the paper’s first author. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The device maintained spheroid cultures for up to 2 weeks.

    “This device was able to maintain spheroid cultures for up to 2 wk (110).”

    From Modeling physiological events in 2D vs. 3D cell culture (2017) · cites this paper as [110]

    The Results and discussion section, under “Long-term culture of spheroids in hanging drops” (page unavailable), reports viable spheroids after 12 days of culture. This supports long-term maintenance with the device, but the copy does not establish the claimed two-week (14-day) duration. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [4]Kubbies AIM, Biomol J. Screening, 2006, 11, 922– 932. 16973921
  2. [20]Peters KB, Wang H, Brown JM and Iliakis G, Cancer Res, 2001, 61, 5425– 5431. 11454687

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tung, Y.-C., Hsiao, A. Y., Allen, S. G., Torisawa, Y.-S., Ho, M., & Takayama, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Takayama, Shuichi
Venue
The Analyst
Published
2011
Volume
136
Issue
3
Pages
473-478
ISSN
  • 0003-2654 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-5528
OpenAlex
W2045387133
Cited by
969
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 103 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 71 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 27
FWCI
17.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Analyst (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Scholarworks@UNIST (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (Z01BC010891)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › 3D IC and TSV technologies
Keywords
multicellular spheroids, hanging drop culture, 384-well plate, high-throughput screening, drug testing, 5-fluorouracil, tirapazamine, anticancer agents, antiproliferative activity
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Cell Survival, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Humans, Osmolar Concentration, Time Factors, Spheroids, Cellular, Cell Culture Techniques, Cell Line, Tumor, High-Throughput Screening Assays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review