The DOI matches its Crossref record; 136 of the 136 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Blood–brain barrier structure and function and the challenges for CNS drug delivery
Abstract
The neurons of the central nervous system (CNS) require precise control of their bathing microenvironment for optimal function, and an important element in this control is the blood–brain barrier (BBB). The BBB is formed by the endothelial cells lining the brain microvessels, under the inductive influence of neighbouring cell types within the ‘neurovascular unit’ (NVU) including astrocytes and pericytes. The endothelium forms the major interface between the blood and the CNS, and by a combination of low passive permeability and presence of specific transport systems, enzymes and receptors regulates molecular and cellular traffic across the barrier layer. A number of methods and models are available for examining BBB permeation in vivo and in vitro, and can give valuable information on the mechanisms by which therapeutic agents and constructs permeate, ways to optimize permeation, and implications for drug discovery, delivery and toxicity. For treating lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs), models can be included that mimic aspects of the disease, including genetically‐modified animals, and in vitro models can be used to examine the effects of cells of the NVU on the BBB under pathological conditions. For testing CNS drug delivery, several in vitro models now provide reliable prediction of penetration of drugs including large molecules and artificial constructs with promising potential in treating LSDs. For many of these diseases it is still not clear how best to deliver appropriate drugs to the CNS, and a concerted approach using a variety of models and methods can give critical insights and indicate practical solutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1982) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(82)90076-5 · Cited by 9,089
Astrocyte-endothelial interactions at the blood-brain barrier
Abbott, N. J., Rönnbäck, L., & Hansson, E. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1824 · Cited by 5,595
Self-citationStructure and function of the blood–brain barrier
Abbott, N. J., Patabendige, A. A. K., Dolman, D. E. M., Yusof, S. R., & Begley, D. J. (2010) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2009.07.030 · Cited by 5,185
Self-citationPericytes regulate the blood–brain barrier
Armulik, A., Genové, G., Mäe, M., Nisancioglu, M. H., Wallgard, E., Niaudet, C., He, L., Norlin, J., Lindblom, P., Strittmatter, K., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09522 · Cited by 2,843
Pericytes: Developmental, Physiological, and Pathological Perspectives, Problems, and Promises
Armulik, A., Genové, G., & Betsholtz, C. (2011) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2011.07.001 · Cited by 2,653
Pericytes are required for blood–brain barrier integrity during embryogenesis
Daneman, R., Zhou, L., Kebede, A. A., & Barres, B. A. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09513 · Cited by 2,128
The role of inflammation in epilepsy
Vezzani, A., French, J., Bartfai, T., & Baram, T. Z. (2011) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2010.178 · Cited by 1,876
Pathways of clathrin-independent endocytosis
Mayor, S., & Pagano, R. E. (2007) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2216 · Cited by 1,556
Medicinal chemical properties of successful central nervous system drugs
Pajouhesh, H., & Lenz, G. R. (2005) · NeuroRX · doi:10.1602/neurorx.2.4.541 · Cited by 1,535
Bell, R. D., Winkler, E. A., Sagare, A. P., Singh, I., LaRue, B., Deane, R., & Zlokovic, B. V. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.043 · Cited by 1,448
Cited by
The blood–brain barrier: Structure, regulation and drug delivery
Wu, D., Chen, Q., Chen, X., Han, F., Chen, Z., & Wang, Y. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01481-w · Cited by 1,906
A new look at cerebrospinal fluid circulation
Brinker, T., Stopa, E., Morrison, J., & Klinge, P. (2014) · Fluids and Barriers of the CNS · doi:10.1186/2045-8118-11-10 · Cited by 819
Overcoming the Blood–Brain Barrier: The Role of Nanomaterials in Treating Neurological Diseases
Furtado, D., Björnmalm, M., Ayton, S., Bush, A. I., Kempe, K., & Caruso, F. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201801362 · Cited by 708
The blood-brain barrier: Physiology and strategies for drug delivery
Pandit, R., Chen, L., & Götz, J. (2020) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2019.11.009 · Cited by 651
Mechanisms of fluid movement into, through and out of the brain: evaluation of the evidence
Hladky, S. B., & Barrand, M. A. (2014) · Fluids and Barriers of the CNS · doi:10.1186/2045-8118-11-26 · Cited by 633
Metadata
- Authors
- Abbott, N. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-04-23
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 437-449
- ISSN
- 0141-8955 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2665
- OpenAlex
- W1965522214
- Cited by
- 909
- References
- 136
- FWCI
- 24.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blood–brain barrier structure and function and the challenges for CNS drug delivery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10545-013-9608-0
- The paper
- Abbott, N. J. (2013). Blood–brain barrier structure and function and the challenges for CNS drug delivery. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10545-013-9608-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.