The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
State-Dependency of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Open accessAbstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), a tool that allows noninvasive modulation of cortical neural activity, has become an important tool in cognitive neuroscience and is being increasingly explored in neurotherapeutics. Amongst the factors that are likely to influence its efficacy, the importance of the baseline cortical activation state on the impact of TMS has not received much attention. However, this state-dependency is important as the neural impact of any external stimulus represents an interaction with the ongoing brain activity at the time of stimulation. The effects of any external stimulus are therefore not only determined by the properties of that stimulus but also by the activation state of the brain. Here we review the existing evidence on the state-dependency of TMS and propose how its systematic study can provide unique insights into brain function and significantly enhance the effectiveness of TMS in investigations on the neural basis of perception and cognition. We also describe novel approaches based on this state-dependency which can be used to investigate the properties of distinct neural subpopulations within the stimulated region. Furthermore, we discuss how state-dependency can explain the functional mechanisms through which TMS impairs perception and behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Synaptic plasticity: taming the beast
Abbott, L. F., & Nelson, S. B. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/81453 · Cited by 2,263 · cited 1×
“Activity-driven synaptic plasticity carries the risk of destabilizing the properties of neuronal networks (Abbott and Nelson 2000), and the homeostatic model enables stabilization of neuronal activity by adaptation of the level of postsynaptic response that leads to synaptic plasticity.”
Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects
Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R., & Martin, A. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.006 · Cited by 2,256
Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex
Ungerleider, S. K. A. L. G. (2000) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.315 · Cited by 2,159
Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features
Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03209251 · Cited by 1,107
Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention
Desimone, R. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.24.13494 · Cited by 1,028 · cited 1×
“In this view, neurons that code features irrelevant to identification of a stimulus become less responsive to that stimulus, leading to a sparser representation of stimuli (Desimone 1996; Wiggs and Martin 1998).”
Properties and mechanisms of perceptual priming
Wiggs, C. L., & Martin, A. (1998) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(98)80144-x · Cited by 848
Schacter, D. L., & Buckner, R. L. (1998) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80448-1 · Cited by 829
Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies.
Gibson, J. J., & Radner, M. (1937) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0059826 · Cited by 755
Siebner, H. R., Lang, N., Rizzo, V., Nitsche, M. A., Paulus, W., Lemon, R. N., & Rothwell, J. C. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5316-03.2004 · Cited by 711
Paus, T., Jech, R., Thompson, C. J., Comeau, R., Peters, T., & Evans, A. C. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-09-03178.1997 · Cited by 700
Cited by
Rossi, S., Hallett, M., Rossini, P. M., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2009) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016 · Cited by 5,367
Horvath, J. C., Forte, J. D., & Carter, O. (2015) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.400 · Cited by 609
Siebner, H. R., Funke, K., Aberra, A. S., Antal, A., Bestmann, S., Chen, R., Classen, J., Davare, M., Di Lazzaro, V., Fox, P. T., et al. (2022) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2022.04.022 · Cited by 566
Methodology for Combined TMS and EEG
Ilmoniemi, R. J., & Kičić, D. (2010) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-009-0123-4 · Cited by 431
Thut, G., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2010) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-009-0115-4 · Cited by 388
Metadata
- Authors
- Silvanto, J., & Pascual-Leone, A.
- Venue
- Brain Topography
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 0896-0267 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6792
- OpenAlex
- W2104137290
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 11.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: State-Dependency of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10548-008-0067-0
- The paper
- Silvanto, J., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2008). State-Dependency of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Brain Topography. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-008-0067-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
